Quote:
Originally Posted by maklelan
When you engage the evidence I'll consider you as having spoken for yourself, but up to this point you haven't even entered the discussion.
|
I don't have to engage in the evidence because, as I stated before, there are many scholars that disagree with your interpretation of Psalm 82 and I believe their translation over those of liberals and unbelievers such as yourself.
Quote:
|
Yeah. The discovery and dissemination of Ugaritic texts and understanding since over the last 50 years has revolutionized Hebrew studies. Unfortunately, most of those books written 40 years ago were written by senile old apologists who didn't like taking part in paradigm shifts. Scholarship has moved beyond the weak apologetics of the early and mid twentieth century.
|
So, you really expect me and others to believe that a language that was discovered in 1928 is just now transforming Hebrew studies and that no one up until now could understand it enough to translate it? Yeah, right!
Quote:
|
I quoted it in my last post. You're clearly defending the OP's perspective. If you weren't you wouldn't be making these ludicrous inferences.
|
You quoted nothing of the sort and not a thing I stated was ludricrous. You are being dishonest, which is not surprising but it should be for a supposed "scholar".