You are responsible for knowing
CARM
You are responsible for knowing and following the rules.

MAIN | WELCOME| RELIGIONS | MOVEMENTS | HETERODOX | THEOLOGY | SECULAR | ISSUES | MINISTRY | LIFE STYLE | YOUTH | OTHER | DEBATES | ADMIN | PRIVATE | EVANGELICAL

 
  Discussion Forums

WWW.CARM.ORG | REGISTER | RULES | PURPOSE | ABREV | RADIO | PODCASTS | MUSIC | STORE | SUPER  | FORUM'S AUTHORITY STRUCTURE | BIBLE GATEWAY


Go Back   Christian Discussion Forums - CARM > CULTS/GROUPS > Mormonism (LDS)
Home Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Social Groups Who's Online
Register Blogs FAQSupport & Super Membership Members List Calendar Arcade Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Chat Room [15]

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-26-2009   #8
NHisMage
Super Member
 
NHisMage's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tennessee (originally from Virginia)
Posts: 13,903
Blog Entries: 3
Reputation: 1806
NHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 pointsNHisMage 501-1600 points
Quote:
Originally Posted by maklelan View Post
When you engage the evidence I'll consider you as having spoken for yourself, but up to this point you haven't even entered the discussion.
I don't have to engage in the evidence because, as I stated before, there are many scholars that disagree with your interpretation of Psalm 82 and I believe their translation over those of liberals and unbelievers such as yourself.

Quote:
Yeah. The discovery and dissemination of Ugaritic texts and understanding since over the last 50 years has revolutionized Hebrew studies. Unfortunately, most of those books written 40 years ago were written by senile old apologists who didn't like taking part in paradigm shifts. Scholarship has moved beyond the weak apologetics of the early and mid twentieth century.
So, you really expect me and others to believe that a language that was discovered in 1928 is just now transforming Hebrew studies and that no one up until now could understand it enough to translate it? Yeah, right!

Quote:
I quoted it in my last post. You're clearly defending the OP's perspective. If you weren't you wouldn't be making these ludicrous inferences.
You quoted nothing of the sort and not a thing I stated was ludricrous. You are being dishonest, which is not surprising but it should be for a supposed "scholar".
NHisMage is online now   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
copyright CARM 2006,2007,2008,2009
Number of Page Loads since Jan 2008
unique graphics
DialUp Internet Providers