10 killed at mass shooting at a Chinese New Year festival

No biologist has said that a fetus is not human life. All biologists also say an unfertilized egg and sperm are human life as well.

Whether those forms of human life should take priority over the life of a woman is the issue. Your side says yes.
So you are saying life begins prior to birth
 
No biologist has said that a fetus is not human life. All biologists also say an unfertilized egg and sperm are human life as well.

Whether those forms of human life should take priority over the life of a woman is the issue. Your side says yes.
You have now said that you approve of taking a life of a person.
 
So you are saying life begins prior to birth
Life is a continuum.

I think your concern is personhood, that is when a particular fetus or fertilized egg is recognized by law as a person deserving of rights independent of the rights of the pregnant woman
 
No biologist has said that a fetus is not human life. All biologists also say an unfertilized egg and sperm are human life as well.

Whether those forms of human life should take priority over the life of a woman is the issue. Your side says yes.
So the answer is to kill the human life? That solves the issue? Well aparently it solves the issue as the blood of the innocent is shed and sacrificed.
 
Life is a continuum.

I think your concern is personhood, that is when a particular fetus or fertilized egg is recognized by law as a person deserving of rights independent of the rights of the pregnant woman
Should bad law be opposed?
 
So the answer is to kill the human life? That solves the issue? Well aparently it solves the issue as the blood of the innocent is shed and sacrificed.
The answer is to allow doctors to follow best medical practices and to allow women to have agency over their own bodies and lives.
 
Back
Top