Where have all the Christians gone?

BMS said:
Ah ok. So since there are two sexes for it, there cant be one sex for it. That is what makes same sex acts unnatural.
Click to expand...
So, if it being unnatural is your criteria for wrong as you make clear above, will you here and now condemn playing tennis as wrong on the same grounds you condemn homosexuality?
BMS said:
I didnt mention reproduction.
Click to expand...
Picky picky.
BMS said:
Even without reproduction there are still two sexes, two sexes with compatible anatomy for it. Since you made the point, its another nail in the coffin of your argument. The 'no consequence' is yours.
Click to expand...
There are two two sexes with compatible anatomy for sex, therefore same sex interaction is wrong because...…. . What?
BMS said:
How people use inanimate objects doesnt change the fact there are two sexes for sexual intimacy which you have already acknowledged
Click to expand...
You miss the point, being, it's not how people use inanimate objects, but the principle that people can use things not for what they were intended and it not be wrong.
 
Whatsisface said:
But just saying this doesn't say why it's perverted and depraved. If it's so obvious, I wonder you don't readily give the reason.
Click to expand...
Perverted and depraved is an opinion, I agree but its only an opinion. The existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for it isnt an opinion but rather observable reality. You seem unwilling to acknowledge observable reality at the same time taking offence to opinions.
 
Leatherneck0311 said:
Asked and answered; however, you appear to be firmly stuck in advocating for perversion.
Click to expand...
More ad hominem and evasion instead of giving a reasonable answer to my points.

Let's make it easy for you. A screwdriver is made for driving screws. Is it a perversion to use a screwdriver to open a paint tin, ie, a reason not for what it is meant?
 
BMS said:
Perverted and depraved is an opinion, I agree but its only an opinion. The existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for it isnt an opinion but rather observable reality. You seem unwilling to acknowledge observable reality at the same time taking offence to opinions.
Click to expand...
Come on BMS, I have already acknowledged that there are two sexes with compatible anatomy.

What you haven't said is why that means same sex interaction is wrong.
 
Whatsisface said:
So, if it being unnatural is your criteria for wrong as you make clear above, will you here and now condemn playing tennis as wrong on the same grounds you condemn homosexuality?
Click to expand...
Not my criteria. My criteria is the existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for sexual intimacy. Whether you think tennis is unnatural and whether I think it is natural doesnt change the existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for sexual intimacy.

Picky picky
Click to expand...
Its picky by you since it wasnt mentioned and doesnt change the existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for sexual intimacy.

There are two two sexes with compatible anatomy for sex, therefore same sex interaction is wrong because...…. . What?
Click to expand...
Because same sex acts involve one sex whereas there are two for it.

[/quote] You miss the point, being, it's not how people use inanimate objects, [/quote] Correct.
but the principle that people can use things not for what they were intended and it not be wrong.
Click to expand...
Never said they couldn't but you think its unnatural to play tennis and I dont think it is. What have those opinions about using objects got to do with the existence of two sexes with compatible anatomy for sexual intimacy?
 
Leatherneck0311 said:
If you don’t have enough common sense to understand that male and female anatomy are compatible sexually then there is no reason to debate anything.
Click to expand...
But so is female and female anatomy, and male and male anatomy. Are you suggesting that the reason that homosexuality is wrong is because homosexuals cannot have satisfying sex lives?
 
Whatsisface said:
Come on BMS, I have already acknowledged that there are two sexes with compatible anatomy.

What you haven't said is why that means same sex interaction is wrong.
Click to expand...
Because since there are two sexes for it, two sexes must be right. Since two sexes is right one sex must be wrong.

Tell us how one sex can be right when there are two for it?
 
Leatherneck0311 said:
Same sex interaction = perversion and depravity. Not happening for folks with morals.
Click to expand...
Everyone has morals. Five percent of them are homosexual. What you mean is that it's not happening for people with YOUR morals. Of which there q great number of people.
 
Temujin said:
Everyone has morals. Five percent of them are homosexual. What you mean is that it's not happening for people with YOUR morals. Of which there q great number of people.
Click to expand...
Morals isnt the issue we were discussing. The issue was what is natural versus unnatural. They are opposites. Since there are two sexes for it there cant be one for it.
 
BMS said:
Morals isnt the issue we were discussing. The issue was what is natural versus unnatural. They are opposites.
Click to expand...
Ah, we're back to natural and unnatural, again. So, are you going to condemn tennis on the same grounds you condemn homosexuality?
BMS said:
Since there are two sexes for it there cant be one for it.
Click to expand...
So what? That doesn't mean it's wrong in any way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top