The Jews believe when they return to the land of Israel, their "Messiah" will come.
The Bible never mentions Polish people, can't find a single verse.
The Jews believe when they return to the land of Israel, their "Messiah" will come.
When I said it was your term , I meant that "Holocaust" has connotations in your religion that it does not have in the Jewish religion. It's not a Jewish religious term for a burnt offering at the temple: it's a Christian term. Jews do not use the Greek. And its an English usage for a specific genocide, that everybody understands, so its used in that context.
Me, I'm not keen on the metaphor myself, as I said, and I agree: Shoah is the preferred Hebrew term. tnx!
It does seem odd.I still don’t understand why we make the distinction between the genocide of European Jews (and Armenians, apparently) as a Holocaust, while referring to all others genocides as genocides.
Mutual.But I do appreciate the respectful discussion! Those are hard to come by in these parts.
Good plan.DO NOT ADVOCATE GENOCIDE!
Probably because of the association with the ovens that Jews were cremated in.
?? Have you nothing to say of the association with the actual meaning of the term??Probably because of the association with the ovens that Jews were cremated in.
If it doesn't bother me, why should it bother you? Sometimes people give up their lives for what they believe.?? Have you nothing to say of the association with the actual meaning of the term??
I’m not so much bothered as I am confused.If it doesn't bother me, why should it bother you?
So what are you suggesting here? That it was a sacrifice???? Please clarify!Sometimes people give up their lives for what they believe.
I haven’t suggested that. But, please do clarify your position, so I can be sure you understand the implications here.I'm not condoning what was done or any other genocide in recent history.
Because we call it Shoah.I’m not so much bothered as I am confused.
I take that back! It does bother me. Why doesn’t it bother you?
I never said the holocaust was a sacrifice. But the idea of Jews being a living sacrifice and dying for our beliefs doesn't bother me.So what are you suggesting here? That it was a sacrifice???? Please clarify!
For being Jews, our faith.Who gave up their life and for what belief, specifically?
You're making a mountain out of a mole hill.(Tagging @Algor - might be interested in hearing this “perspective”)
I haven’t suggested that. But, please do clarify your position, so I can be sure you understand the implications here.
Because we call it Shoah.
I never said the holocaust was a sacrifice. But the idea of Jews being a living sacrifice and dying for our beliefs doesn't bother me.
For being Jews, our faith.
You're making a mountain out of a mole hill.
An interesting suggestion, and plausible.Probably because of the association with the ovens that Jews were cremated in.
WW3?The Bible never mentions Polish people, can't find a single verse.
I've seen that claim no where. Historians claim that the Germans used what they described as the "legacy of impunity" drawn from the precedent setting paradigm of the Armenian genocide to sear their own consciences while committing the same atrocity on the Jews and undesirables.The first genocide labelled a Holocaust was not what later became called the Holocaust. The term was used to describe the Armenian genocide.
The French don't use the Greek-derived term "holocaust," but the actual Jewish term Shoah, which means "utter destruction/whole burnt offering." Most English speakers don't associate "holocaust" with religious ritual. Precious few English translations are using the term any more, although some French translations do.The term is pretty clearly a metaphor: everything is burned, consumed.
If you don't consider the slaughter of innocent human life for a purpose "human sacrifice" you're sugarcoating the atrocity that it was. Those who were intent on slaughter were inhuman ghouls driven with fiendish purpose.The Wiki article has a handy little history. But if you like thinking of Jews as sacrifices to a deity, go for it. It's a nauseating perspective, but whatever floats your boat.
You still deceive yourself. You don't prove anything, but you illustrate what is blocking your ability to see, as Jesus, your Messiah explained. Unless you are born again, you will never be able to see.Rotfl... no, I've just proven my points.
No, my friend, and I do call you friend for your continued contribution. I have to go away during the school year, because I have less time on my hands. I left the Jewish forum because our conversations were becoming redundant, and neither of us want to waste time reiterating.That's why you go away after a while.
Before the death of the testator, the will is a piece of paper, meaningless but for the promise it contains. Upon the death of the testator, the will is enacted upon. That's what happened when Jesus said, "It is finished." The Greek is actually what was said when a debt was paid or a contract completed: It can be translated "Paid in full."The will isn't changed. It stays as is.
Your part is to misunderstand. It wasn't always, but now the misunderstanding must be enforced. You were forewarned and the new covenant was foretold both by Jeremiah and Ezekiel...remarkably parallel promises, both equally ignored by your enforced misunderstanding.Not on our part.
Reputable historians and archaeologists disagree. You have no claim.Luke was never a historian.
Actually, your petty, churlish insults never work with me. Paul knew Judaism better than you do, since Rabbinical Judaism had to make things up from scratch when the temple and the priesthood were destroyed.Actually, Paul is recorded as a liar and involved in murder in the NT.
I just showed you it did...You're stuck back in de Nile.It doesn't exist in Tanakh.
Still a trifling peevish, aren't you?...you're suggesting you have nothing to learn? Keep learning.Then keep learning.
You're not Elijah. You're embarrassing yourself in your childish blasphemies. Why do you do that? It's like you're goading us to see if you can raise up more disrespect from me? Do you really want less respect? It only reveals your own insecurity.Then follow the law that leads to life.
And yet Torah says unclean food defiles. And yet Jesus sat on the flush. What a god. 1 Kings 18:27.
Then you're not Jewish and you have no understanding. Daniel understood, and he never divorced himself from the sin of his people. You have Ahaz and Menasseh to deal with and all the atrocities they committed. You're not exempt, and you have no sacrifice to cover but what your rabbis made up once you were forced to abrogate the law of sacrifices.I've made no idols, certainly not one of a vail of flesh as you have, Exodus 34:17.
Philistine.Which would be what?
Your handicaps are abundantly clear. it comes with being a curmudgeon.Sorry I can't return the complement.
I've seen that claim no where. Historians claim that the Germans used what they described as the "legacy of impunity" drawn from the precedent setting paradigm of the Armenian genocide to sear their own consciences while committing the same atrocity on the Jews and undesirables.
KJV uses it, and KJV still get around!The French don't use the Greek-derived term "holocaust," but the actual Jewish term Shoah, which means "utter destruction/whole burnt offering." Most English speakers don't associate "holocaust" with religious ritual. Precious few English translations are using the term any more, although some French translations do.
Um, OK, but my point of discomfort is that a Holocaust was to a specific deity by specific priests. Its a bit much for me to think on the Holocaust as priests sacrificing to the Jewish Deity IMHO. But if it floats your boat, whatever.One of the most eye-opening documentaries on a little known facet of the Holocaust, what the Germans did in the Ukraine, was done by French Father Patrick Desbois. It was called Holocaust by Bullets/La Shoah par Balles
If you don't consider the slaughter of innocent human life for a purpose "human sacrifice" you're sugarcoating the atrocity that it was. Those who were intent on slaughter were inhuman ghouls driven with fiendish purpose.
EDITED--RULE 12Jacob didn't call him God.
Just did. Jacob was smarter than you, and he did not call a man or an angel God. You just deny what he actually said, because your religion demands that you be blind to God's claims and His Law.State the verse.
I don't have to find where God makes sukkoth with Israel. Not for your sake. And I'll go to the Jewish forum when I can give it the time your threads deserve. I hate glib non-answers to the deeper issues you keep raising.Go for it. I recommend creating a thread in the Judaism forum instead of here. I've already addressed these points here. Send me a link.
Because this is what that looks like. Kindness and respect are lost on you...your religion does not require it.It's been a waste so far.
Kindness and respect aren't required by Judaism?Don't understand why you have to lie...but I observe that you must. Jacob said, Gen 32:30"So Jacob named the place Peniel, saying, 'Indeed, I have seen God face to face, and yet my life was spared.'" He calls Him אֱלֹהִים֙.
Just did. Jacob was smarter than you, and he did not call a man or an angel God. You just deny what he actually said, because your religion demands that you be blind to God's claims and His Law.
I don't have to find where God makes sukkoth with Israel. Not for your sake. And I'll go to the Jewish forum when I can give it the time your threads deserve. I hate glib non-answers to the deeper issues you keep raising.
Because this is what that looks like. Kindness and respect are lost on you...your religion does not require it.
Where is your god? You've answered nothing. Working "behind the scenes" is a dumb answer! According to the Jews, your god has not been seen(or heard) since the destruction of the 2nd temple. Whom Jesus prophesized would be destroyed! Yet Jesus is not a prophet recognized by the Jews. hmmmmmm You think by building the 3rd temple your god will magically appear again?lolI've answered all. At this point you're repeating. Before you speak, think of your hypocritical answers and stance on your NT and god.
Another hypocritical response.
You accept myths in the NT, mythological births, a god that sends to hell all who don't believe in him and kills in plagues, you have prostitutes as "friends", etc.
Ummmm wasn't your god with Adam? Wasn't your god with Noah? When did their blood line turn to pagan gods?lol I guess they didn't believe all the hype?lolJust like in all cases, people have a choice to believe or not. Terah chose to believe in other gods.
It was his track record.
Humans need gratitude, not God.
Neither did Cain! Your answers are out to left field.lolSeth and Abel didn't have eternal life. You're questions are ridiculous.
Okay, therefore it was a mortal man that gave Abraham the land. What I've been saying all along.The verse says he was a man.
No, God Himself gave the land. You still have a problem with the roles of messengers.
No, ours only needs one time to make it right.
Rotfl... there is no idea of anti Messiah. Against God. Get real.
Rotfl... no need for bacon.
You can't even stay on point. What value has Canada added to the world?
I really don't care for anything you have to say on this or any subject.
The middle east doesn't need your help especially when you are "friends" with prostitutes.
So, you admit that there is an ancestral, historical truth to what Palestinians claim. Cool!
LOL. I'm still waiting for you to show me where my GOD or Jesus told anyone to do anything evil. You can't. Yours on the other hand? Slaughters women and children, babies, and anyone else who doesn't bow down to worship him.Dude, you've been hypocritical from that start, hiding the fact that your god kills, sends to hell, you hold to myths in the NT, and a fake birth of your messiah, "befriend" prostitutes and project that to others.
You've been the highest level of hypocrite during our discussions.