Glad to hear thatI am not one of those.
Glad to hear thatI am not one of those.
I know - those are not followed by atheistsI am talking about the rules of debate.
You seem to be supporting them.Why? NT
I would think main stream media would be the same no matter what country. They would love this news story if true. I mean think of all those car accident clips they could run. They like news that makes headlines. That alone shows that the story is false.Yeah, and we all know that thousands of people are driving around after being vaccinated, having seizures, plowing into each other all over the country.....like those bumper car rides at county fairs... Yep, it is downright unsafe for the unvaccinated to venture out onto the roads with all the crazy vaccinated people driving around, having seizures all over the place...(sarcasm intended)
We have stated repeatedly that there are always going to be risks with ANY medicine, for someone, somewhere,, no matter how safe it is deemed, or how long it has been used. THAT is why getting accurate information from experts is so important, amd NOT from YouTube, highly questionable, ultra-right wing websites with poor track records for accuracy thatutilize sensationalism, personality-driven opinion talk shows, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Uh, then why aren't you following the rule that a person who makes an assertion not shared by others in a debate, the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion? I know you are not an atheist.I know - those are not followed by atheists
Never heard of it.You seem to be supporting them.
But I'm talking about in the world that you live in. Media might say or not say lots of things. But in the let's say 2-5 hundred people most do have some personal connection with have you heard various ones having a hard time doing what you're saying...driving their vehicles? Would it not be something at least you'd personally have heard of?....And I don't think the mainstream media could censor such a thing....
Really? Just look at what they have censored.
I know - I was just using atheist rules - seeing how it worksUh, then why aren't you following the rule that a person who makes an assertion not shared by others in a debate, the burden of proof is on the person making the assertion? I know you are not an atheist.
Yeah, if vaccinacted people all over the place were having seizures in their cars and causing car accidents, you can bet legitimate news sources would be all over these stories like fleas on a hound dog.I would think main stream media would be the same no matter what country. They would love this news story if true. I mean think of all those car accident clips they could run. They like news that makes headlines. That alone shows that the story is false.
Why? NTI know - I was just using atheist rules - seeing how it works
This pair is asking what my profession calls "high gain" questions. Bill is doing a fine job of drawing out comments.Dates? How could they rule out lab origins so soon?
In the meantime, has any of your references isolate the original bat population that was the source of SARS2? Or is the bat population hypothetical and not real? What about intermediate host animals?
How did SARS2 develop its furin cleavage site? Only two possibilities. Natural or lab so which is it and what better explains the facts? Lab origins do because they can insert it right where they want it to make it transmissible to humans which they wanted.
Name two ways in which viruses evolve?
Here is a link from Bill Maher's. 90% probability of lab origins from two biologists.
Just exposing atheist hypocrisyWhy? NT
Get a load of this Fauci quote.This pair is asking what my profession calls "high gain" questions. Bill is doing a fine job of drawing out comments.
He's right.Get a load of this Fauci quote.
"Important information and insight can come from generating a potentially dangerous virus in the laboratory…
Wow, this stuff is almost scary! I am glad you tracked this down.You should also be aware that "Facebook banned posts with links to NaturalNews. com, NewsTarget.com, and Brighteon.com, all of which appear to be owned and run by NaturalNews and its founders."
Reference: Anatomy of a Disinformation Empire
But I am not an atheist.Just exposing atheist hypocrisy
Heck, this is typical rush hour in ANY big city in the USA even before covid and the vaccine for it existed!VACCIDENT ALERT: Vehicle accidents caused by vaccine side effects happening all over US roads and highways
(Natural News) If you’ve noticed the mayhem on US roads lately, you’re not the only one. People are driving like maniacs, cutting people out of their lane, swerving, speeding, running red lights, texting while driving and causing horrible wrecks. Besides being brainwashed by the media, more than 50 percent of all drivers are mass medicated with toxic prescriptions and… wait for it… dirty vaccines. That’s right, vaccines are causing vaccidents all over the roadways, as the protein prions EDITED--TOO MANY LINKS
I read some of it. It is actually kind of....chilling.Visited it...didn't read the whole thing. To be honest they bored me.
From what I read I never saw then justify any of their claims.
Yes, it IS supported. If you had gone to that thread, you would have seen it.Nope - atheist rules - I bear no burden
Unsupported
Links contain evidence. At least some of them do.Links are not evidence - so I ask again- When asked to provide evidence for YOUR claims you never do squat - so why so hypocritical?