No Jab for me...here's why...Web site

[Bonnie]

You label anything you disagree with as that. If I posted the interview of the woman I’ve been taking about you would say the same thing. Sad.


Slim to NONE according to Fauci himself. Another lie perpetuated by the MSM.

No, I don't, but I research those websties. NaturalNews isn't exactly what I would call a good place to go for unbiased news. OR NewAmerican.

Please link me to where Fauci actually said there is a slim to none chance of asymptomatic people spreading the virus. IF he did, it may have been early in on, before more studies and tests had been conducted. Because I found this from June 2020:

Dr. Fauci slams WHO for claiming COVID transmission was 'very rare'

The senior US health adviser said Wednesday there was no evidence to suggest that transmission from an asymptomatic person to an infected person was uncommon.

www.dailymail.co.uk

And this:

Anthony Fauci: Asymptomatic transmission never drives outbreaks

'In all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.'

www.israelnationalnews.com

He wrote that asymptomatic people never drive outbreaks; it is symptomatic people who do.

But a large trial on asymptomatic spread is going on. I will need to put the link in the next post, or I will go over the 2 per post limit.

 

[Bonnie]

Here it is:

Dr. Anthony Fauci says large trial on asymptomatic COVID spread could yield answers in about 5 months

Fauci said at the White House coronavirus briefing Friday that a large trial is under way involving 12,000 college students at more than 20 universities.

www.cbsnews.com

I think this is about vaccinated people who could have asymptomatic symptoms of the disease.

however, I did put down a link to recent JAMA report that asymptomatic people CAN spread disease, but not as efficiently, since they don't usually go around coughing all over the place.

 

[4Him]

Not everything. I suspect more information will come out later.

Enough to know he lied.

 

[LifeIn]

Slim to NONE according to Fauci himself. Another lie perpetuated by the MSM.

Fauci did not say those words. That would be the lie. In fact we now know that covid spreads asymptomatically. As more and more vulnerable adults get vaccinated, the disease is not spreading as much in the population that is most likely to show symptoms. Today a full 25% of transmission is occurring among the young, most of whom do not exhibit symptoms. But they most certainly do spread the disease.

 

[4Him]

No, I don't, but I research those websties. NaturalNews isn't exactly what I would call a good place to go for unbiased news. OR NewAmerican.

Please link me to where Fauci actually said there is a slim to none chance of asymptomatic people spreading the virus. IF he did, it may have been early in on, before more studies and tests had been conducted. Because I found this from June 2020:

Dr. Fauci slams WHO for claiming COVID transmission was 'very rare'

The senior US health adviser said Wednesday there was no evidence to suggest that transmission from an asymptomatic person to an infected person was uncommon.

www.dailymail.co.uk

And this:

Anthony Fauci: Asymptomatic transmission never drives outbreaks

'In all the history of respiratory-borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks.'

www.israelnationalnews.com

He wrote that asymptomatic people never drive outbreaks; it is symptomatic people who do.

But a large trial on asymptomatic spread is going on. I will need to put the link in the next post, or I will go over the 2 per post limit.

Spread by Asymptomatic people is slim to NONE.

 

[4Him]

Fauci did not say those words.

Yes he did.

In fact we now know that covid spreads asymptomatically.

Slim to NONE.

 

[LifeIn]

Yes he did.

Note to readers: Take note of different words used in the citation. Also note that the citation was taken from June 2020.

Slim to NONE.

Again, look it up from trusted sources. Anonymous internet voices are not trusted sources.

 

[4Him]

Note to readers: Note the lack of a citation. Go look it up yourself before taking anyone's word for it.


Again, look it up from trusted sources. Anonymous internet voices are not trusted sources.

Note to readers. If you believe all the MSM feeds you, you are the problem.

 

[LifeIn]

Note to readers. If you believe all the MSM feeds you, you are the problem.

I agree. Talk to your own family doctor rather than taking what you hear on MSM.

 

[4Him]

I agree. Talk to your own family doctor rather than taking what you hear on MSM.

I have. It’s one of the reasons I’ll never allow them to inject that poison in me.
Also, note that family Drs know little to nothing about vaccines just as they know little to nothing about the drugs they prescribe.

 

[inertia]

It states their objectives and activities on that link. I took the quote about their liberal agenda directly from their literature.

Ah yes. I read that too.

lib·er·al
adjective

1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.

2.) relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.

It is not in the company's interest to promote a politically democratic socialist philosophy as this would erode their objectives. It is an independent non-profit organization.

Truth decay is accelerating as evidenced by this continued discussion on this thread.

...

 

[Bonnie]

Ah yes. I read that too.

lib·er·al
adjective

1. willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas.

2.) relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.

It is not in the company's interest to promote a politically democratic socialist philosophy as this would erode their objectives. It is an independent non-profit organization.

Truth decay is accelerating as evidenced by this continued discussion on this thread.

...

A teacher of mine in college--I think it was in a course on the government--told my class that in politics, a liberal wants to change something, whereas a conservative wants things to stay the same. He said it was about the best way to define the terms in politics.

So, liberal is not necessarily a bad thing or a dirty word. It depends upon what they want to change. Nor is conservative a bad word or necessarily a bad thing. It depends upon what one wants to to stay the same. It just depends uponthe circumstances.

 

[Bonnie]

Spread by Asymptomatic people is slim to NONE.

But where did Fauci say those words? Can you please link me to that?

 

[Bonnie]

Yes he did.

Where? Can you link us to where he used those words?

Slim to NONE.

WHERE? Can you please provide a link to where he used those words? I saw where he said "unlikely", but that was early on and more is known now.

 

[Bonnie]

Fauci did not say those words. That would be the lie. In fact we now know that covid spreads asymptomatically. As more and more vulnerable adults get vaccinated, the disease is not spreading as much in the population that is most likely to show symptoms. Today a full 25% of transmission is occurring among the young, most of whom do not exhibit symptoms. But they most certainly do spread the disease.

I tried to find online where Fauci said those words and could not. Just "unlikely." But that was early on and we know more now.

 

[Bonnie]

Just being feisty - relax - dont take it personal

Why the need to be feisty?

 

[Bonnie]

We already know.

We shall still see as more information comes to light from more mainstream news sources.

 

[Bonnie]

The article is behind a paywall.

I find it hypocritical that conservatives are anxious to blame the guy at the top of this institute, Fauci, for a particular grant. OTOH they claim that conservative leaders should not be held accountable for actions taken by the organizations they head. For example, Mar-a-lago was found to have illegals as employees, some for more than 10-15 years, and yet Trump was excused from any responsibility. Current Senator and former Gov Rick Scott was head of a healthcare company that was fined $1.6billion for the largest Medicare fraud scam at that point, but Scott faced no charges and GOP voters were fine with this. But somehow Fauci should get direct blame for funding this research. Research that 1) has not been tied to the pandemic and 2) is not considered a dangerous virus by many conservatives.

I was able to read it. Sorry about that. I don't take the magazine, either. Odd...I relooked at the article and could read it. But it said ai had 4 free looks left, or something like that. Do not know why you can't access it.

Thanks, but what did you mean by "is not considered a dangerous virus"?

 

[Harry Leggs]

What is MSM?

Main stream media. You know, the ones who feed you all swill with sources like this....

Rebekah Jones, the COVID Whistleblower Who Wasn’t

This is a story about Rebekah Jones, a former dashboard manager at the Florida Department of Health (FDOH), who has single-handedly managed to convince millions of Americans that Governor Ron DeSantis has been fudging the state’s COVID-19 data.

www.yahoo.com

But it’s not true. Indeed, it’s nonsense from start to finish. Jones isn’t a martyr; she’s a myth-peddler. She isn’t a scientist; she’s a fabulist. She’s not a whistleblower; she’s a good old-fashioned confidence trickster. And, like any confidence trickster, she understands her marks better than they understand themselves. On Twitter, on cable news, in Cosmopolitan, and beyond, Jones knows exactly which buttons to push in order to rally the gullible and get out her message.

For a year now, pretty much everyone who has criticized Jones has met the same fate as did Salemi. It doesn’t matter who they are, or what they have been arguing, the play is always the same. First, they are called a sexist or a racist or a member of the “alt-right.”{Inertia continual John Birch Society association comes to mind] Next, it is implied that they are working with Ron DeSantis or with Vladimir Putin—or, sometimes, with both. Then they are told that they hate “science”—or, if they disagree with her or expose a given lie or confirm that she does not have the qualifications or experience she claims, that they have sold out. And, finally, they are added to Jones’s “enemies” list (she really has one, and used to publish it online), and an attempt begins to get them kicked off Twitter or Substack or whatever portion of the Internet they are using to explain the ruse. Because a good number of the people Jones has targeted are not journalists or public figures, but scientists and public servants, such attacks work pretty well. If your career is in epidemiology, and your employer is a public university, there is little to be gained by attracting scandal....

Everywhere Jones goes—whether it’s Louisiana State University (where she got her master’s), Florida State, or the Florida Department of Health—she seems always to leave a trail of wreckage. And somehow, it’s always someone else’s fault.

 

[ferengi]

Why the need to be feisty?

Oh Lord take a lude man