Jewjitzu
Well-known member
Yeah, I don't see it. I wait for another, an actual seed of David.
Yeah, I don't see it. I wait for another, an actual seed of David.
Good luck, dude.Yeah, I don't see it. I wait for another, an actual seed of David.
Absolute nonsense. You have no idea what Ezekiel 37-45 actually portrays...shall we wade in the river? Eat from the trees?And yet Ezekiel 37-45 show otherwise.
Try sacrificing with a marred lamb...or keep rolling on the floor, never understanding.Rotfl... whatever.
Innocent in the sense of innocent...guiltless and that's not the point: innocent blood pollutes the land, and the land vomits out the inhabitants...it's called sin-made climate change.Innocent in the sense of not deserving to be murdered.
Really? Shall we talk about Achan and his whole family, then? Or ignore it altogether? Want to talk about Uzzah? Or shall we talk about the plague on Israel because of Saul's sin against the Gibeonites that was mitigated by sacrificing seven of his descendants? Hmm?Actually, quite funny given that you have no support in Torah for human sacrifice as a means of atonement.
Naaah...I just see denial. God transcends time.See above.
Untenable albeit wishful falsehood. You miraculously elevate eleven fishermen to the position of Superman, not a single retraction from their own eyewitness account...and a multiplication of falsified hostile fabrications, none of which agree or account for demonstrable history. You're stuck with an empty tomb.Jesus' body was moved elsewhere.
False. Sin carries the death penalty. The entire sacrificial system was designed for remission by the shedding of the blood of a pure and spotless lamb. You have abrogated nearly the entire book of Leviticus to support your new religion, that bears no resemblance at all to what Moses prescribed. It's not at all surprising, given the antiquity of your traditional denials, that you do not see this.Already done. It's not in Torah.
...and the means is likewise clear...to be received or rejected.God, the Father, is already my Redeemer, Isaiah 63:16.
Really? Your neoJudaism has abrogated nearly the entire book of Leviticus, and proliferated so many excuses for it, it's laughable. I said this in another post: Your religion bears absolutely no resemblance to the religion Moses prescribed...You justify your traditions merely by the antiquity thereof. You have nothing more.Both needed. That's the point.
No, that would be Paul, you, and your teachers.
No...it's the problem of the one whose religion is based entirely on denial.Your problem.
Which Israel? The political entity that was birthed in the Balfour agreement?Actually, God will judge the nations on how they treated Israel.
Why do you believe Jesus' death ended the Sinai covenant?You don't think Jews before Jesus' death were obligated to follow the Sinai covenant? Really? Do you just excise the Tanak (OT) from your bible?
You are misrepresenting the Law. PART of the law is that God forgives. Repent and turn back to God is the teaching of every prophet. It's not as if no one was forgiven before Jesus' death.It's absolutely correct to say the thief failed at the Law, so if he was to be saved it would not be thru his performance of commandments,
he would have to put his trust in God to save him. This is the same for anyone and everyone.
"I (God) am the Lord, and besides Me there is no savior."
I certainly don't. I didn't argue for that. I was saying that the standard Christian understanding (and I am not a Christian) is that Jesus' death ended the Sinai covenant, but that it was in full force before that.Why do you believe Jesus' death ended the Sinai covenant?
We refer to the People of Israel, also known as Hebrews and Jews. No one was talking politics. The context was clear.Which Israel? The political entity that was birthed in the Balfour agreement?
I only contend that no law is savior, only God is.You are misrepresenting the Law. PART of the law is that God forgives. Repent and turn back to God is the teaching of every prophet. It's not as if no one was forgiven before Jesus' death.
It's not as if no one was saved before Mosaic law was given, to Israel.It's not as if no one was forgiven before Jesus' death.
The Torah doesn't talk about being saved from sins. That is a Christian idea. The Torah is about obeying God's laws simply because God is God. The prophets underscore this.I only contend that no law is savior, only God is.
Anyone anytime has to believe in God and His promises, and trust God as only Savior.
agree/disagree?
It's not as if no one was saved before Mosaic law was given, to Israel.
In Joel 2 we read that whosoever shall call on the name of YHVH shall be saved.When the thief on the cross died, how were his sins forgiven prior to his death?
Was he still obligated to the law and required to bring sacrifices for his confessed sins, or did Jesus forgive him with just words, a prayer?
For that matter, by what thinking did Jesus forgive others in the NT by just saying your sins are forgiven since the law still applied and sacrifices were required for those before his death, according to Christian theology?
Since Jesus didn't break the law according to Christians, what justifies him forgiving people without a sacrifice?
Where does the thief call on the sacred name of God?In Joel 2 we read that whosoever shall call on the name of YHVH shall be saved.
In Habakkuk 2:4, the just shall live by faith.
In Genesis 15:6, Abraham was accounted righteous because he believed God.
In Exodus 34, YHVH told Moses he would have mercy upon him whom he would have mercy, and be gracious towards those whom he would be gracious.
So, the thief called on the name of YHVH, and believed his word.
Therefore, he was accounted righteous.
Thank you. Good luck with the virgin birth myth.Good luck, dude.
Wow, you can't handle prophecy? It's clear the 3rd temple and sacrifices come back with Messiah prince offering sacrifices for himself.Absolute nonsense. You have no idea what Ezekiel 37-45 actually portrays...shall we wade in the river? Eat from the trees?
Marred lamb? That would be Jesus who was beaten up, or was he the goat?Try sacrificing with a marred lamb...or keep rolling on the floor, never understanding.
Never said otherwise that murder doesn't pollute the land.Innocent in the sense of innocent...guiltless and that's not the point: innocent blood pollutes the land, and the land vomits out the inhabitants...it's called sin-made climate change.
Actually, we found Jesus' tomb. So much for his resurrection.Really? Shall we talk about Achan and his whole family, then? Or ignore it altogether? Want to talk about Uzzah? Or shall we talk about the plague on Israel because of Saul's sin against the Gibeonites that was mitigated by sacrificing seven of his descendants? Hmm?
Naaah...I just see denial. God transcends time.
Untenable albeit wishful falsehood. You miraculously elevate eleven fishermen to the position of Superman, not a single retraction from their own eyewitness account...and a multiplication of falsified hostile fabrications, none of which agree or account for demonstrable history. You're stuck with an empty tomb.
Aaah, there were several animals that could be offered, besides doves, and flour cakes, etc.False. Sin carries the death penalty. The entire sacrificial system was designed for remission by the shedding of the blood of a pure and spotless lamb.
In what way? Don't you teach one blood sacrifice does it all though Torah says nothing of this?You have abrogated nearly the entire book of Leviticus to support your new religion, that bears no resemblance at all to what Moses prescribed. It's not at all surprising, given the antiquity of your traditional denials, that you do not see this.
Your words are rejected....and the means is likewise clear...to be received or rejected.
Luk 23:42 WEB He said to Jesus, “Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom.”Where does the thief call on the sacred name of God?
NeoJudaism? You're confused with what you and Paul practice.Really? Your neoJudaism has abrogated nearly the entire book of Leviticus, and proliferated so many excuses for it, it's laughable.
I said this before. I really don't care what you think. One who worships a created man should keep silent.I said this in another post: Your religion bears absolutely no resemblance to the religion Moses prescribed...You justify your traditions merely by the antiquity thereof. You have nothing more.
No...it's the problem of the one whose religion is based entirely on denial.
Israel has been around since the 2nd temple and before, Jeremiah 33:17-26.Which Israel? The political entity that was birthed in the Balfour agreement?
Yes, Joel 2:32, specifically the context calls out Mount Zion and Jerusalem.In Joel 2 we read that whosoever shall call on the name of YHVH shall be saved.
Yes, his faith, acted out as Abraham did.In Habakkuk 2:4, the just shall live by faith.
Yes, faith with action.In Genesis 15:6, Abraham was accounted righteous because he believed God.
Yes, beautiful, but that isn't in Exodus 34, it's Exodus 33 and the context was Israel.In Exodus 34, YHVH told Moses he would have mercy upon him whom he would have mercy, and be gracious towards those whom he would be gracious.
Which never happened.So, the thief called on the name of YHVH, and believed his word.
Then so are all Jews today. Thank you.Therefore, he was accounted righteous.
Which isn't a reference to YHWH, as humans aren't the God. Abraham, Moses, David, etc., were called Lord too.Luk 23:42 WEB He said to Jesus, “Lord, remember me when you come into your Kingdom.”
Jesus said otherwise.Yes, Joel 2:32, specifically the context calls out Mount Zion and Jerusalem.
Yes, his faith, acted out as Abraham did.
Yes, faith with action.
Yes, beautiful, but that isn't in Exodus 34, it's Exodus 33 and the context was Israel.
Which never happened.
Do they believe YHVH's Word?Then so are all Jews today. Thank you.