We all being Lord of the Sabbath does not follow from Scripture.
It not only follows from scripture, it necessarily follows logically. Again, "The Sabbath was made FOR MAN...etc"
You cannot legitimately says "I am lord of the Sabbath."
I most certainly can due to the fact that the Sabbath was made FOR human beings. It was made for my benefit just as much as anyone else who chooses to take advantage of this blessing from God.
Stop blaspheming God based upon misinterpreting Mark 2:20.
Your Ad Hominem is noted, and Ignored.
John: "and the Word was God" (John 1:1);
But he never says that God was the word. God is manifested in, with, and through Christ, yet John was probably familiar with 1 Corinthians 8: 6 which clearly distinguishes between God and Christ. Q.E.D.
Jesus: "Before Abraham was, I AM" (John 8:58);
Existence should never be conflated with origin. Again, see 1 Cor.8:6
Thomas calling Jesus, "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28);
Debunked so many times, those who continue to post this are simply engaging in blatant deception.
Paul: "the church of God, which He bought with His own blood" (Acts 20:28);
This doesn't prove squat, and you know it.
Paul: "the Christ, who is God over all, blessed forever." (Rom. 9:5)
"Christ
came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen."
Paul: "the kingdom of the Christ and God" (Eph. 5:5);
The kingdom of Christ, and God.
Paul: "[Christ Jesus] though He was in the form of God" (Phil. 2:6);
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers
(6) Being in the form of God.—(1) The word “being” is here the more emphatic of the two words so translated, which lays stress on the reality of existence (as in
Acts 16:20;
Acts 17:28;
1Corinthians 11:7;
Galatians 2:14). Hence it calls attention to the essential being of Christ, corresponding to the idea embodied in the name Jehovah, and thus implying what is more fully expressed in
John 1:1. (2) The word “form” (which, except for a casual use in
Mark 16:12, is found only in this passage of the New Testament) is to be carefully distinguished from “fashion.” There can be no doubt that in classical Greek it describes the actual specific character, which (like the structure of a material substance) makes each being what it is; and this same idea is always conveyed in the New Testament by the compound words in which the root “form” is found (
Romans 8:29;
Romans 12:2;
2Corinthians 3:18;
Galatians 4:19). (3) On the other hand, the word “fashion,” as in
1Corinthians 7:31 (“the fashion of this world passeth away”), denotes the mere outward appearance (which we frequently designate as “form”), as will be seen also in its compounds (
2Corinthians 11:13-14;
1Peter 1:14). The two words are seen in juxtaposition in
Romans 12:2;
Philippians 3:21 (where see Notes). Hence, in this passage the “being in the form of God,” describes our Lord’s essential, and therefore eternal, being in the true nature of God; while the “taking on Him the form of a servant” similarly refers to His voluntary assumption of the true nature of man.
"thought it not a prize to be grasped at to be equal with God," is somehow ignored by those who would rather grasp at it for him.
Paul: "in [Christ] the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily" (Col. 2:9);
Note the preposition "en" which denotes within, and should never be conflated with the form itself. You're conflating the contents with the container.
Paul: "our God and Lord, Jesus Christ" (2 Thess. 1:12);
Our God, and Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul: "the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ" (Tit. 2:13);
The glory of our great God, and Savior Jesus Christ. This example as well as the rest are all due to how one chooses to add their own punctuation which in many cases depends upon their preconceived ideas of the Trinity.
Hebrews: "But of the Son he says, “Your throne, O God" (Heb. 1:8);
Peter: "the righteousness of our God and Savior, Jesus Christ" (2 Pet. 1:1);
The righteousness of our God, and Savior Jesus Christ.
"But to us there is but ONE GOD, THE FATHER,"
It doesn't get more straightforward than that. How many Gods? ONE. Who is God? THE FATHER.
"...OF whom are all things,"
Denoting the ORIGIN of everything.
".. and we in him;"
By YOUR logic, this makes us God as well!!!!
"... and one Lord Jesus Christ, BY whom are all things, and we BY him.” 1 Cor.8:6
Denoting the MEANS by which everything comes into existence.
By your logic, we can just as easily conflate origin and means as well as the father and son. You don't do this so you are being inconsistent in your logic.
Your snide remarks and Ad Hominem are becoming too tiresome for me to bother with any further. I don't see that you're here to engage in an honest discussion so may you go with God. Be blessed.