AV Eph 4:11-13 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers; 12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: 13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
Quoting a verse explaining the gifts of God given to the church to attain unity...
Doesn't harmonize with your goal to divide and destroy that unity.
We need to agree what the scope of scriptures are, in GOD's Point Of View, and not man's point of view(Historically Edited Version) !!!
You have the Free Will Choice from GOD to choose, what you want to believe. Until GOD reveals the fullness of Omniscience to us. BTW, Coming soon !!!
No, we don't. You bear the onus to defend your beliefs, and you haven't done that.
So says you, in your own opinion, apart from evidence that can be Googled.
You are out of sync with CARM's understanding:
https://forums.carm.org/#churches-orthodox-heterodox.33
Do you care, that you are critiquing CARM's stated position here ???
Did you read this excerpt from your own reference on Wiki?
Non-Sabbatarianism is the view opposing all Sabbatarianism, declaring Christians to be free of mandates to follow such specific observances. It upholds the principle in Christian church doctrine that the church is not bound by such law or code, but is free to set in place and time such observances as uphold Sabbath principles according to its doctrine: to establish a day of rest, or not, and to establish a day of worship, or not, whether on Saturday or on Sunday or on some other day. It includes some Protestant denominations.
This is the view that I showed you from the Augsburg Confession, published in 1530. Divergent groups followed later, according to your own source, and constructed their own view of sabbatarianism. This existed in the time the Augsburg Confession was published, and it is acknowledged in Article 28:
For those who judge that by the authority of the Church the observance of the Lord’s Day instead of the Sabbath-day was ordained as a thing necessary, do greatly err. Scripture has abrogated the Sabbath-day; for it teaches that, since the Gospel has been revealed, all the ceremonies of Moses can be omitted. And yet, because it was necessary to appoint a certain day, that the people might know when they ought to come together, it appears that the Church designated the Lord’s Day for this purpose; and this day seems to have been chosen all the more for this additional reason, that men might have an example of Christian liberty, and might know that the keeping neither of the Sabbath nor of any other day is necessary.
There are monstrous disputations concerning the changing of the law, the ceremonies of the new law, the changing of the Sabbath-day, which all have sprung from the false belief that there must needs be in the Church a service like to the Levitical, and that Christ had given commission to the Apostles and bishops to devise new ceremonies as necessary to salvation. These errors crept into the Church when the righteousness of faith was not taught clearly enough.
Trent rejected many of these tenets that are borne in the advent of the Reformation. From these tenets the notion of sabbatarianism is rejected by the church from a purely biblical basis. Employing the fallacy of
argumentum ad populum from sources after Augsburg isn't sufficient to overturn this historical fact.
That doesn't help your case.
But will that disagreement end in dying(or killing) for a personal belief ???
Resorting to threats of violence doesn't help your case, either.
I understand you do not believe this.
That's because you can't support this nonsense.
But when it becomes Truth before your eyes and ears, You must choose a side to be on !!!
The "when" is now, as God spoke through David, saying
“Today, if you will hear His voice,
Do not harden your hearts.”
AV Hb 10:29-31 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him that hath said, Vengeance [belongeth] unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people. 31 [It is] a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
Here you quote a passage that promises harsh judgment on those who have rejected the new covenant in the Blood of Jesus Christ.
Which is what I observed you to be guilty of in the previous post.
Are you suffering from selective memory loss again, or is it your intent to invite the judgment of God on yourself?
None of this is helping your case.
GOD will have "Vengeance" or "judge his people" without any help from man.
This isn't consistent with the quote you provided. You still haven't defended your charge of the alleged redefined mark of the beast or that Gentiles are under the Mosaic covenant.
I warn people of this future reality. Others deny it. Still others, do not care in either outcome.
No support, just utter narcissistic delusion. The reality is that you can repent of your sins and come to Christ,
Or...
...pretend you're something you're not. Coming to Christ will mandate the rejection of SDA Fundamental Belief #24, which in turn will force the rejection of SDA Fundamental Belief #18 - and recognize the source of the fantasy you presently prefer over the Bible.
I find it prudent to point out that you still can't support your own
theories fallacies - there I fixed that.
Selective memory loss is a wonderful way to forget about your failure on this thread. You don't even know what you wrote anymore.