brightfame52
Well-known member
Reread what I posted to you it stands !YOu don't think God spoke directly to Moses? You don't believe the bible?
Reread what I posted to you it stands !YOu don't think God spoke directly to Moses? You don't believe the bible?
The Lord did speak face to face with Moses.YOu don't think God spoke directly to Moses? You don't believe the bible?
God is One in all Three. Two of the Three have a second nature in union with the essence of God.
- God is ECHAD, one, not three in one. Christianity teaches Trinitarianism, which although it is monotheism, is a muddied monotheism. Judaism on the other hand teaches a pure and simple monotheism. Anything that comprises the oneness of God is unthinkable.
God spoke to the prophets through visions and dreams. Thats not the point. She said that God spoke to Moses through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and that was just not true -- it was face to face.The Lord did speak face to face with Moses.
How did God speak to Jeremiah? Isaiah? All the Prophets? Did He speak face to face with all of them like He did with Moses?
That's the point you miss.
I read what you said. YOu said that God spoke to MOSES through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Thats just not true -- it was face to face.Reread what I posted to you it stands !
Dreams and visions by means of the Spirit. Is the Holy Spirit absent in the Torah?God spoke to the prophets through visions and dreams. Thats not the point. She said that God spoke to Moses through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and that was just not true -- it was face to face.
Well if you reread what I posted, it stands. digest itI read what you said. YOu said that God spoke to MOSES through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Thats just not true -- it was face to face.
There are three places the word Holy Spirit occurs in the Tanakh. But it means something very different for Jews than for Christians. It is not a separate person from the Father. It is rather the divine force of God.Dreams and visions by means of the Spirit. Is the Holy Spirit absent in the Torah?
King David begged that God would not remove the Holy Spirit from him.
"Cast me not away from Thy presence; and take not Thy Ruach Hakodesh from me." Psalm 51:11
What is your point in all this? What does it reveal?I read what you said. YOu said that God spoke to MOSES through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Thats just not true -- it was face to face.
If you not know Jesus? You will not be able to know the Word of God as it should be known on such matters.There are three places the word Holy Spirit occurs in the Tanakh. But it means something very different for Jews than for Christians. It is not a separate person from the Father. It is rather the divine force of God.
To say that a person cannot understand the Bible unless they know Jesus is just absurd. Those that understand the bible the best are scholars of the Bible.What is your point in all this? What does it reveal?
If you not know Jesus? You will not be able to know the Word of God as it should be known on such matters.
Do you think I was shocked to know that what the Bible says is true? I was shocked... and then given great peace about it.
You do not understand. Its not a matter of mere logic. It must include God's Spirit enabling you to understand. Then.. you to might find yourself shocked to find out its real...
No words can describe it. Christians simply look at each other and acknowledge in the other what they know unbelievers do not know.
But....be that as it may? Some will be right. God causes it to be that way.To say that a person cannot understand the Bible unless they know Jesus is just absurd. Those that understand the bible the best are scholars of the Bible.
You know, Mormons say the same things about the Book of Mormon that you say about the New Testament. It doesn't make them right either.
They can have their own understanding of the Bible. But, without knowing Jesus they will not be able to know the Bible. History they can understand from the Bible. But, not the spiritual reality.To say that a person cannot understand the Bible unless they know Jesus is just absurd. Those that understand the bible the best are scholars of the Bible.
You know, Mormons say the same things about the Book of Mormon that you say about the New Testament. It doesn't make them right either.
I don't know if I was replying to anything specific when I wrote that.
- RAKOVSKY WROTE:
Basically, in terms of understanding the prophetic Legacy and ancient Judaism, it does appear that Jesus fulfilled the role of the Messiah, God's anointed, as Jesus was the one to spread knowledge of the god of Israel around the world. Even Muslims consider Jesus Messiah and so as at least an indirect result of the ministry of Jesus the Muslims have come to know God of Abraham, albeit there is the argument that their knowledge is imperfect. In any case when you count the Christian and Muslim world, you are talking about most of the world's population in total considering Jesus as Messiah and recognizing the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob.
As a result, there are Jewish philosophers in modern times who see Jesus as specifically the Messiah to the Gentiles although they don't see him as the Jewish Messiah. If I remember correctly one of them was named Rosenzweig. I would have to look it up again to be sure to get it right.
I repeat, and I will continue to repeat, Jesus did NOT fulfill the Messianic prophecies in the Tanakh.
1. Most of the prophecies that Christians say he fulfilled are actually not prophecies at all, but are about other things, and Christians yank them out of context. This would be passages like Isaiah 53.
2. Some of the prophecies that Jesus fulfilled are fulfilled by a great many people, such as being a descendant of David.
3. The important prophecies, prophecies that only the Messiah would fulfill, Jesus did not fulfill. For example, the Messiah will usher in an era of worldwide peace between the nations. Jesus just didn't do that. And thats not the only one. I usually list three.
A loaded question or complex question is a question that contains a controversial assumption. Such questions may be used as a rhetorical tool: the question attempts to limit direct replies to be those that serve the questioner's agenda. The traditional example is the question "Have you stopped beating your wife?"
There is this whole theology in Christianity about how the Messiah would be rejected by His people. This comes up as a theme in the New Testament where Jesus gives this reasoning that it has to have happened that the Son of Man would be rejected.2 For he shall grow up before him as a tender plant, and as a root out of a dry ground: he hath no form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we should desire him.
3 He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief: and we hid as it were our faces from him; he was despised, and we esteemed him not.
4 Surely he hath borne our griefs, and carried our sorrows: yet we did esteem him stricken, smitten of God, and afflicted.
5 But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the chastisement of our peace was upon him; and with his stripes we are healed.
6 All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned every one to his own way; and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.
Well - I'll give you the certain FOOLISH, and IGNORANT (any maybe only "Nominal") Christians may get "Frustrated" about this that and the other thing.Bob, I have to insist, Christians do get frustrated about certain things.
Harel,Sorry for the late reply. I've been putting off answering some things on here.
I find it surprising that you would question the reliability of the Tanach. Aren't you Christian?
In any case, I think the Tanach is reliable, but the meaning of that reliability is fluid and is bound to change from person to person. I personally would say that first and foremost, I believe in Tanach out of faith in my religion, which includes an unbroken tradition in the validity of the Tanach. Secondly, as time moves on, more and more archeological discoveries are being found that further validate the Tanach. Not everything has been found yet, but I think we're slowly but soundly heading in a positive direction. Thirdly, some of the Tanachic prophecies have already been fulfilled.
Here's why I think the meaning of that reliability is fluid. In my opinion, Jesus didn't fulfill any Tanachic prophecies. A Christian, on the other hand, would say that he did, in fact, fulfill many, and that's a basis for belief in the truth of the prophecies of the Tanach. A minimalist person in Biblical archeological terms would claim that multiple archeological discoveries actually show that the Tanach is entirely or almost entirely unreliable. Such a person could still be religious. For example, Werner Keller, who wrote The Bible As History, was a Christian pastor but was clearly minimalistic in his views. Some random examples: He thought that David wasn't the name of King David but was a later misinterpretation of an ancient Mesopotamian tribal leadership title, the "davidum", and he thought that Manna wasn't literally miracle foodstuff from heaven but a kind of sweet plant. So Keller's and other religious minimalists' views on the Tanach would be that it's either much more symbolical than viewed by most or that we simply don't have enough understanding of the Biblical lingo to correctly interpret that when they say X, they actually mean Y.
So I think that it would be hard to try to "disprove" a prophecy. For instance, someone could argue that God changed His mind as in the case of the story of Jonah's prophecy against Nineveh.Ezek 26:1–21 and 29:17–21 present a formidable challenge to the deuteronomic criterion for a true prophet. In the former passage Ezekiel predicted that Nebuchadnezzar's army would conquer Tyre and plunder its wealth. In the latter passage, written 16 years later, Ezekiel admitted that Nebuchadnezzar's army obtained no plunder from its campaign against Tyre. He issued a corrective prophecy that promised Egyptian booty as a consolation. For the most part scholarship has considered the historical problem the key to the first prophecy. Whereas some interpreters appeal to multiple historical fulfillments, others allow the evidence to impugn Ezekiel's integrity. By appealing to the function of mythological imagery in Ezekiel's oracles against the nations, this article proposes an alternate approach to the impasse.
Two points.The question in the OP, "Why Jews will never accept Jesus" is not correct, because in fact over the centuries many Jews like GeneZ in this very thread have done so. So it is a "loaded question." Wikipedia says:
But if you reword the question in terms of "Why are there many Jews who have not accepted Jesus", then the question can inadvertently contain its own answer. Isaiah 53 says:
There is this whole theology in Christianity about how the Messiah would be rejected by His people. This comes up as a theme in the New Testament where Jesus gives this reasoning that it has to have happened that the Son of Man would be rejected.
So if you are familiar with this theme, then the question answers itself. It becomes like asking: "If the Messiah is supposed to be rejected by the people, then why do many Jewish people reject Jesus?"
Lol.....Two points.
First, Isaiah 53 is not about the Messiah, but about Israel. The servant metaphor is used throughout the book of Isaiah, and is identified as follows:
Isaiah 41:8
But you, Israel, my servant, Jacob, whom I have chosen, you descendants of Abraham my friend,
So basically, there is nothing to say that the messiah is supposed to be rejected by people.
Isaiah 41 can be about Israelites descended from Jacob, but in Isaiah 49, the "Servant" switches identity away from the Israelites, because in Isaiah 49, God says that it's this other Servant's job to gather the Israelite tribes, thus creating a distinction: "now, saith the Lord that formed me from the womb to be his servant, to bring Jacob again to him"Two points.
First, Isaiah 53 is not about the Messiah, but about Israel. The servant metaphor is used throughout the book of Isaiah, and is identified as follows:
Isaiah 41:8
But you, Israel, my servant, Jacob, whom I have chosen, you descendants of Abraham my friend,
So basically, there is nothing to say that the messiah is supposed to be rejected by people.
Secondly, while there are occasional converts among Jews, in general the Christian gospel just doesn't make inroad into the Jewish community. I mean, look, you have converted all of Europe, the Americas, Australia, and your missionary efforts are now paying off in Africa and Asia. But STILL Jews are not leaving Judaism for the church, despite obvious efforts on the part of Christians to "reach" us.