You keep dodging the use of "my God" in John 20:28.You keep contradicting yourself. You say there’s only one Yahweh and since the God of a Jesus is Yahweh then Jesus must be his own God if not then you have more than one Yahweh
You keep dodging the use of "my God" in John 20:28.You keep contradicting yourself. You say there’s only one Yahweh and since the God of a Jesus is Yahweh then Jesus must be his own God if not then you have more than one Yahweh
What do you do with Philippians 2:9-11 also?Incorrect, beause Thomas knew there is only one YHWH and he still referred to the Lord Jesus as "my God."
You should know that whenever a believer uses the expresson "my God" in the Bible it always refers to the Almighty.
What do you do with Philippians 2:9 also.
Not if the Father is one Yahweh speaking to another in Psalm 2:7!Incorrect. There is only one YHWH. And He alone is the proper recipient of worship. Jesus is properly worshiped. Therefore, Jesus is YHWH.
That doesn't prove your case at all.Not if the Father is one Yahweh speaking to another in Psalm 2:7!
And what is that?The same thing with Acts 2:36.
Thomas is seeing the Father in Jesus just like Jesus said in John 14:10. You’re still arguing for two Gods and two YahwehsYou keep dodging the use of "my God" in John 20:28.
Thomas is seeing the Father in Jesus just like Jesus said in John 14:10.
That is baloney and very clearly Paul in Romans 13 reveals that our obedience to the rulers over us is obedience unto God himself being God ordained them.That doesn't prove your case at all.
Worship is due unto God alone.
In Matthew 4:10 (cf. Luke 4:8) both proskyneō and latreuō are used in association with one another in that only God is to be the only recipient of each. As seen in other passages throughout the New Testament one cannot diminish or separate what proskyneō means without also doing so concerning latreuō found within the same context.
a. Serving (latreuō) the host of heaven corresponds with worshiping (latreuō) idols (Acts 7:42, 43)
b. Paul went to Jerusalem to worship (proskyneō) corresponds with him serving (latreuō) God (Acts 24:11, 14).
c. Those in white robes worshiping (proskyneō) God corresponds with them serving (latreuō) God (Revelation 7:11, 15).
Sorry but the Greek word "proskyneō" is used for the word "worship" in Matthew 2:2 and they came to worship the one who was born King of the Jews and not the one who was born as Almighty God.
Yes but he isn’t working through us as he did with Jesus and that’s why we can’t say “If you’ve seen me you’ve seen the Father”.The Father is in all believers (2 Corinthians 6:16), but believers are not to refer to one another as "my God" - nor do they do so in the Bible.
So your argument does not work.
Thus proving "my God" refers to the Almighty because this is what it always means by believers when used in the Bible.Yes but he isn’t working through us as he did with Jesus and that’s why we can’t say “If you’ve seen me you’ve seen the Father”.
Sorry but Paul very clearly reveals in Philippians 2:9-11 that Jesus is given a name above all others and a name that he has obviously never had before this and that refutes your delusion also concerning Philippians 2:6 and what the words "form "morphe" of God" are really meaning as well.No need to finagle around your confusion. Prove your case concerning this passage.
Only in your little dream land and fantasia that you exist in, does the above refute the facts that I gave you and again, the Magi came to worship Jesus not as God but as the one born King of the Jews and just like the passage very clearly reveals also.You should be sorry. I supplied evidence that backs up my claim. You couldn't refute it.
Try again.
Here it is again:
In Matthew 4:10 (cf. Luke 4:8) both proskyneō and latreuō are used in association with one another in that only God is to be the only recipient of each. As seen in other passages throughout the New Testament one cannot diminish or separate what proskyneō means without also doing so concerning latreuō found within the same context.
a. Serving (latreuō) the host of heaven corresponds with worshiping (latreuō) idols (Acts 7:42, 43)
b. Paul went to Jerusalem to worship (proskyneō) corresponds with him serving (latreuō) God (Acts 24:11, 14).
c. Those in white robes worshiping (proskyneō) God corresponds with them serving (latreuō) God (Revelation 7:11, 15).
Yes! You totally dodged the evidence I supplied.Only in your little dream land and fantasia that you exist in, does the above refute the facts that I gave you and again, the Magi came to worship Jesus not as God but as the one born King of the Jews and just like the passage very clearly reveals also.
You ignored the rest of what I wrote. My God refers to the Father in Jesus just as Jesus said in John 14.Thus proving "my God" refers to the Almighty because this is what it always means by believers when used in the Bible.
The Father is in all believers working through them.You ignored the rest of what I wrote. My God refers to the Father in Jesus just as Jesus said in John 14.
Just as he did in Jesus?The Father is in all believers working through them.