No, you know LUTHERANISM better than my popes and bishops. You know what LUTHERANISM has taught you about what Catholics believe and teach--and those caricatures are well reflected in your posts.
My church doesn't teach "caricatures" about what your church teaches. Besides, I don't look at my church's writings, when I do research on Catholicism.
Since Catholics believe they have the exact same indwelling of the Holy Spirit, claiming that you know the truth becasue you have the indwelling of the Spirit isn't helpful.
You can "believe" it all you want to, but that doesn't mean you do. IF Catholics did have the HS, they wouldn't have elected a lot of lousy popes; nor would they pray to the physically dead; nor would they have popes as leaders who must be obeyed in order to have salvation; nor would they forbid marriage to single priests; nor would they teach such false doctrines as Mary's PV, IC, and being crowned Queen of heaven; nor would they teach and believe in Purgatory...
Again, Bonnie, if you take off the Lutheran glasses----and stop reading our documents in order to confirm your Lutheran presuppositions...
Why should I stop reading Catholic documents?
Fine. But it is also being placed in right relationship/relationship with God.
Which is what happens when we believe in Jesus Christ as Lord and God and Savior, who saves us completely.
They increase our capacity to bear the Grace of God in our hearts, and bring that Grace into the world. But--since you believe justification is a mere declaration whereby God declares us Not-Guilty--I can understand why you would have a difficult time with this concept. One is either guilty or not-guilty. You cannot be any less guilty than not-guilty. Thus, how can works make one any less guilty than not-guilty? It is like trying to go slower than stop.
Works don't increase our capacity to bear the Grace of God in our hearts. That sounds rather silly. The HS enables us to do what He wants us to do and this is all grace--His undeserved love/merit, on account of what Jesus Christ did for us on the cross, which is ours BY FAITH.
1 Corinthians 15:10
New International Version
10 But by the grace of God I am what I am, and his grace to me was not without effect. No, I worked harder than all of them—yet not I, but the grace of God that was with me.
For Catholics justification is being washed in the blood of Christ through Baptism--by which one is not merely declared "not-guilty," but actually made non-guilty. Because of this, one is in right relationship with God. We are God's child in and through Christ who lives within.
That is what it is for us, too, but not just through Baptism by by coming to faith in Jesus Christ, even without Baptism. Remember what Peter said in Acts 15, NASB:
6 The apostles and the elders came together to look into this [c]matter. 7 After there had been much debate, Peter stood up and said to them, “Brethren, you know that [d]in the early days God made a choice among you, that by my mouth the Gentiles would hear the word of the gospel and believe. 8 And God, who knows the heart, testified to them giving them the Holy Spirit, just as He also did to us; 9 and He made no distinction between us and them, cleansing their hearts by faith. 10 Now therefore why do you put God to the test by placing upon the neck of the disciples a yoke which neither our fathers nor we have been able to bear? 11 But we believe that we are saved through the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they also are.
God gives us His grace through Holy Baptism, the Lord's Supper, and by believing in His Holy Gospel, even before one has had a chance to be baptized or partake of the Eucharist.
Fine. I told you I agree with this.
God's Grace enables the works, yes. Fine.
But those works do NOT help to save us. "He saved us, NOT on account of works which we have done in righteousness, but on account of His mercy." (Titus)
Asked and answered--like what? 10 times now? Do you think the answer is going to change if you keep asking the question?
Did you? I think you said Boniface's Bull didn't apply to Protestants back then because they didn't exist when he wrote that (paraphrasing). But didn't you also say it still applied today? So, does it only apply to Catholics OR does it apply to everyone now, since Protestants DO exist today?
Inspired? There is only one thing on this Earth that can claim to be inspired and that is the Bible.
Okay. But then, how are Popes picked? Does the HS not encourage the college of cardinals to make the right choice? OR is it all politics? What?
The Church is infallible, not inspired. In other words----the Spirit protects and guides the Church from teaching error.
Unfortunately, your church's leadership has ignored the HS and what the Bible teaches and has taught reams of error for hundreds of years.
That does not mean every pope that gets elected was chosen by the Holy Spirit.
Well, Alex the VI certainly was not! So, only some are chosen by the HS...so, who chooses the others?
The process by which a pope is selected is marred by sin, politics and human weakness. The Holy Spirit just prevents the process or the pope from going off the rails so to speak and destroying the Church.
Seems to me your church has been derailed from the truth of what the Bible actually teaches, for centuries now.
We didn't make a goddess of Mary. That is a Lutheran caricature.
No, it is no caricature. Look at the Marian festival in Seville, Spain. A dreadful, idolatrous spectacle if ever there was one! Just because Catholics refuse to believe it is idolatry, doesn't make it less so!
Where are you getting this from?
What your church teaches. Its popes have been teaching errors for centuries; therefore, it has no authority from God anymore.
Too right you are! The Church either teaches truth or it does not. If the Church is going to be the pillar of truth---she best know what she is talking about.
Not YOUR church. It doesn't uphold the truth of God's word, but has dragged in heretical doctrines that are nowhere in Scripture, or even hinted at.
No, Marty used his opinions on the Bible, then decided--the Church should believe them.
NOW who is using a caricature, in this case, of what Martin Luther did? And I do note the "Marty" to show contempt for him. Childish.
Luther went to the Bible, reading the NT in the original Greek and spotted errors in translation, such as your church translating the Greek word for "repent" as "do penance." But he found the truth about justification before God within the pages of Romans. He believed what Paul wrote. Was what Paul wrote only HIS opinions?
That is for another time.
Why? The Lutherans there would probably be more than willing to discuss such errors with you. I know I would.
You seem to think they exist, so why not tell us what they are?