So you cant prove evo can create new information?
So you cant prove evo can create new information?
Evolution has no evidences...And you never proved it cannot. It is unproven either way.
Meanwhile, all the evidence from genetics, biochemistry (such as amino acid sequences), the fossil record, biodistribution, morphology, etc. overwhelming supports evolution. This is why ovber 99% of biologists accept evolution is true.
Evolution has no evidences...
Surprised to see you showing your face again. Interesting that you make this statement, asserting your uninformed opinion as fact, without any evidence for it.Evolution has no evidences...
See here:So you cant prove evo can create new information?
Threads are not evidence - LOLSee here:
- Can Evolution Create Information (part 1)?
I started a thread "On Measuring Information" about how IDists measure information, and I now want to look at how that can be applied to evolution. IDists offered two quite different ways to measure information. I will look at the other another time. Here is the first: One way is to measure...forums.carm.org
What type of evidence in what form would you'd accept, then?Threads are not evidence - LOL
And yet you routinely link to other threads to support your nonsense. Odd that. Hypocritical, one might even say.Threads are not evidence - LOL
Ok, who else wants to air their opinion before we start talking scienceThis is an obvious error. I myself deny that Biological Evolution is not part of reality. I assert that Biological Evolution is part of reality.
You are wrong, and I just showed it. Your undeniable fact is very deniable.
Go back and rewrite your post.
You need someone to prove your opinion?Prove it
Ok, who else wants to air their opinion before we start talking science
Thought you were going to talk science?Oh cool, we're going to talk science. Excellent!
Shall we start by making sure we have the basics down.
What does the theory of evolution explain?
Thought you were going to talk science?
Sorry I wasn’t more clear. When I said “science”, I didn’t mean science fiction.
ok, go on...
The Theory of Evolution is science.Thought you were going to talk science?
Sorry I wasn’t more clear. When I said “science”, I didn’t mean science fiction.
ok, go on...
Congratulations, you too qualify for an elementary course in critical thinking.The Theory of Evolution is science.
You were reasonably asked if you had a basic (even layman's) understanding of the thread topic, and responded with bluster (re. no science).
You're out of your depth here, friend.
On the evidence so far, he would be out of his depth on a wet sidewalk.The Theory of Evolution is science.
You were reasonably asked if you had a basic (even layman's) understanding of the thread topic, and responded with bluster (re. no science).
You're out of your depth here, friend.
You being unwilling/unable to discuss the thread topic was a simple observation; no critical thinking was necessary in making it.Congratulations, you too qualify for an elementary course in critical thinking.
Congratulations, you too qualify for an elementary course in critical thinking.
Evolution is a modern myth no matter how much you want and need it to be true. It’s a theory in crisis soon to be replaced by ID in places currently keeping evolution on life support.
Just as soon as ID can be explained without reference to God it will become the new “science”. It’s just troublesome for the time being because intelligent design strongly infers God of the Bible.
But just wait, a “new secular god” is on the horizon, one that you will like, trust me. You can bet he’ll be just like you, he won’t like the God of the Bible either
Dunning-Kruger.How do you know that the theory is wrong if you don't even know what the theory explains?
I suggested an elementary course in critical thinking for you.How do you know that the theory is wrong if you don't even know what the theory explains?