I predict she will claim she has never said those things.Ahem: "Dru mpf" "orangutan" "Orange Menace"
I predict she will claim she has never said those things.Ahem: "Dru mpf" "orangutan" "Orange Menace"
There's no need to be so hateful.
Wrong again. I seek to confirm my will to His.God as defined by you? A God that just happens to agree with you on just about everything? And you say we should follow this God of yours?
So God just ignores you and does not teach you anything?Never said that.
My point is that the God created by some people to validate their hatreds and prejudices does not exist.
You obviously do not agree, childish word games not withstanding.I agree.There's no need to be so hateful.Too bad they weren't still in the womb, so you could have saved yourself the anguish.
Prove itYou obviously do not agree.
You obviously do not agree, childish word games not withstanding.
Nope, and your own post proves it:No. I DO agree.
Too bad they weren't still in the womb, so you could have saved yourself the anguish.
I dont agree to anything - you cant prove your claim and cannot disprove my irrefutable facts.
I think moral upbringing is not exclusive to Christians. Therefore you agree with me in living in a theocracy?I don't think atheists should be let out in public with decent moral people.
We've established that you are seemingly unable to be honest about the matter, certainly.We've been through the equal opinion discussion but you don't seem to be able to comprehend it.
Everyone decides for themselves what is moral. We've already established that.No let's not stick to humans as they have failed at every turn. The last thing any person needs is Brandon or piglosi deciding what's moral. God help us
What you call facts I call opinion. Jesus was a socialist.
Prove it.Jesus was a socialist.
Prove it. Prove you atheists have morals.I think moral upbringing is not exclusive to Christians.
We have established you projectWe've established that you are seemingly unable to be honest about the matter, certainly.
Ummm he was a white supremacist.....He wasn't a Democrat card carrier, that we know of, but he was authoritarian left
Which means he is a good demomarxist socialist atheist.Ummm he was a white supremacist.....
Socialism isn't about seizing wealth. The Early Church did not cease it's wealth. It was given to them voluntarily, to be distributed as needed among it's members.I can't find a verse where Jesus advocated Caesar seizing people's wealth. Where are you seeing that?
Yes it is - its a mental illness born of insecurity and the need to control others and take their property./Socialism isn't about seizing wealth.
Which is charity not socialism.It was given to them voluntarily, to be distributed as needed among it's members.
So socialism is a voluntary, not compulsory option. It cannot be imposed on those who do not want it.Socialism isn't about seizing wealth. The Early Church did not cease it's wealth. It was given to them voluntarily, to be distributed as needed among it's members.
Prove it.
You mean you dont know any atheists, Buddhists, Hindus, etc...that are raised with good morals? There are monks that lead a much more "holy' life then you can possibly comprehend.Prove it. Prove you atheists have morals.
Socialism isn't about seizing wealth. The Early Church did not cease it's wealth. It was given to them voluntarily, to be distributed as needed among it's members.