Not much of what RCs post about RCC beliefs are the truth. The evidence is in the fact that they are unable to prove their false beliefs.And what did I say that wasn't true?
Not much of what RCs post about RCC beliefs are the truth. The evidence is in the fact that they are unable to prove their false beliefs.And what did I say that wasn't true?
There is no mediatrix and no comparison to eve is needed. It is just false teachings.One Mediator of the New Covenant. Heb 12:24
If you want to understand the role of Mediatrix then you need to understand the role that Eve played. She assisted Adam in the downfall of Man. Mary assisted Jesus in Man's redemption.
Why can RCs not show one apostle that taught their rubbish about eve/mary comparison???????There is no mediatrix and no comparison to eve is needed. It is just false teachings.
One Mediator of the New Covenant. Heb 12:24
If you want to understand the role of Mediatrix then you need to understand the role that Eve played. She assisted Adam in the downfall of Man.
Mary assisted Jesus in Man's redemption.
This rule isn't a valid rule because we can't apply it to all Christian beliefs.
E.g. where does scripture, Jesus, or his apostles speak of the book of Hebrews as being the inspired word of God? They don't, so are we to reject the book as being the inspired word of God? We don't get to pick and choose what Christian belief to apply that rule to.
Only in your opinion. The whole of the Church at the Council of Ephesus proclaimed otherwise. You on the other hand is just making that determination all by your lonesome. I think I'll believe the Church over your determination.She was not the mother of God.
How is that non-biblical? Jesus is indeed God Incarnate on this earth as the scriptures say. Mary is indeed the woman who bore God Incarnate onto this earth as the scriptures also say. At the very least, even you would have to admit that she is indeed the mother of God Incarnate on this earth. For you to deny that, you would have to also deny that Jesus is God Incarnate."But Jesus is God so equally Mary is the mother of God" and other such nonbiblical nonsense.
Sounds like something right out of RCC's uninspired unwritten Tradition, nowhere to be found in God's inspired Scripture.One Mediator of the New Covenant. Heb 12:24
If you want to understand the role of Mediatrix then you need to understand the role that Eve played. She assisted Adam in the downfall of Man. Mary assisted Jesus in Man's redemption.
Only in your opinion. The whole of the Church at the Council of Ephesus proclaimed otherwise. You on the other hand is just making that determination all by your lonesome. I think I'll believe the Church over your determination.
How is that non-biblical? Jesus is indeed God Incarnate on this earth as the scriptures say. Mary is indeed the woman who bore God Incarnate onto this earth as the scriptures also say. At the very least, even you would have to admit that she is indeed the mother of God Incarnate on this earth. No?
See, one has to separate the two. God the Father, who is and always has been in existence - no Mary is not His mother. But when God came to this earth as Jesus, that is something quite different.
Where was God's inspired scripture for the first 300 years or so? Not in existence as you now know them. Sure, there were snippets here and there, in fact lots of different writings that were being disseminated around the Christian world. But the truth is, that is all there was - the traditions of the newly evolving Christian Church.Sounds like something right out of RCC's uninspired unwritten Tradition, nowhere to be found in God's inspired Scripture.
He was God Incarnate, the deity come to earth. Any claim to the contrary is in error and totally unbiblical. Ergo, she is indeed the Mother of God Incarnate. (At the very minimum)Jesus' body, by the seed of the woman, was born of the flesh. His Deity was not. Ergo, Mary is NOT the mother of God. She is the mother of baby Jesus.
And you would be wrong.Methinks the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit might take issue with that claim.
It makes complete sense and is biblical.It's beyond ludicrous and unbiblical.
You cannot see the forest for the trees.I have yet to see any Scripture, with which the Holy Spirit will lead us into ALL truth that even hints at that.
He was God Incarnate, the deity come to earth. Any claim to the contrary is in error and totally unbiblical. Ergo, she is indeed the Mother of God Incarnate. (At the very minimum)
Only in your opinion. The whole of the Church at the Council of Ephesus proclaimed otherwise. You on the other hand is just making that determination all by your lonesome. I think I'll believe the Church over your determination.
How is that non-biblical? Jesus is indeed God Incarnate on this earth as the scriptures say. Mary is indeed the woman who bore God Incarnate onto this earth as the scriptures also say. At the very least, even you would have to admit that she is indeed the mother of God Incarnate on this earth. For you to deny that, you would have to also deny that Jesus is God Incarnate.
See, one has to separate the two. God the Father, who is and always has been in existence - no Mary is not His mother. But when God came to this earth as Jesus, that is something quite different.
And you would be wrong.
It makes complete sense and is biblical.
You cannot see the forest for the trees.
Why can RCs not show one apostle that taught their rubbish about eve/mary comparison???????
In the hands of blood washed redeemed sinners. Who was it that persecuted those who held tightly to the inspired scriptures?Where was God's inspired scripture for the first 300 years or so?
Did Eve assist Adam in his downfall? Yes of course she did. She conversed with the devil. She gave in to temptation. She picked the fruit and ate it. Then she handed it to her husband.Sounds like something right out of RCC's uninspired unwritten Tradition, nowhere to be found in God's inspired Scripture.
Did Eve assist Adam in his downfall? Yes of course she did. She conversed with the devil. She gave in to temptation. She picked the fruit and ate it. Then she handed it to her husband.
Mary, on the other hand, conversed with an angel and gave her consent to her role in God's plan of Redemption. She gave flesh to the Incarnate word - the fruit of her womb, which was nailed back onto the tree.
The New Adam and the New Eve completely undid what the first ones did.
- and we can't show any apostle claiming that the book of Hebrews is the inspired word of God.The same was they can't show any apostle claiming to forgive sin. Because they didn't.
Scripture speaks of the first and last Adam; not a word about New Eve.Did Eve assist Adam in his downfall? Yes of course she did. She conversed with the devil. She gave in to temptation. She picked the fruit and ate it. Then she handed it to her husband.
Mary, on the other hand, conversed with an angel and gave her consent to her role in God's plan of Redemption. She gave flesh to the Incarnate word - the fruit of her womb, which was nailed back onto the tree.
The New Adam and the New Eve completely undid what the first ones did.