Wrong again on your part.you know full well she isn't saying that
Wrong again on your part.you know full well she isn't saying that
disingenuousDefine filled in the mathematical sense.
You are claiming that vibise believes, "women are never sexual aggressors"?Wrong again on your part.
You talk in vague terms a lot of the time. Standard procedure for someone just blowing smoke, but totally useless if you are trying to be precise.disingenuous
Why don't you provide the numbers to prove me wrong?
You are claiming that vibise believes, "women are never sexual aggressors"?You talk in vague terms a lot of the time. Standard procedure for someone just blowing smoke, but totally useless if you are trying to be precise.
I am basing my comment on my analysis of her past postingsYou are claiming that vibise believes, "women are never sexual aggressors"?
why can't you people debate in good faith?
no I'm notNow you are downplaying the sexual abuse of underage girls. Interesting.
I just know you have your pet point to get across and are willing to sacrifice other truths in order to promote it.no I'm not
furthermore, you know I'm not
so you really believe she thinks "women are never sexual aggressors"?Wrong again on your part.
She lives in a world where people who disagree with her have no redeeming qualitiesso you really believe she thinks "women are never sexual aggressors"?
you really believe that in your heart of heats?
Well, I can't speak for her, but if she actually believes that I would be surprised.
Actions, how you live your life and the things you do and think.What actions?
It’s the Baptists that are raping kids and covering it up. It’s the Baptists that are constantly obsessing over other people’s sexuality.
I’m not the least bit surprised by this.
You said it seemed like that to you so what else has he said that makes you think that?lol
That is the exact same attitude that allowed all the sexual abuse by Baptist.
Ol’ Reverend Joe is a good Christian. He’d never rape a child. We better cover for him.
No, evangelicals are not really obsessed with homosexuality, rather woke and lgbtqi+ cant stand it being criticised, hence your own comments about it being rude and insulting.Of course there will be homosexual cases. Evangelicals are obsessed with homosexuality. That’s a sure sign plenty of them are self-loathing, closeted gays.
Plenty of feedback now that up to.10% of.school children now identify as some.sort of gender confusion WHERE GENDER IDEOLOGY IS BEING TAUGHT..... and many of your rabid homophobes are gays and lesbiansI never said anything about a larger percentage than scientists say.
I said rabid homophobes are very often closeted gay. That's just an objective fact.
The Baptist Church is filled with rabid homophobes.
How many women aggressors are on the list released by the Baptists?So is it your contention that women are never sexual aggressors. I refer you to the many cases of women teachers have sex with underage students
I never said that women are never sexual abusers, only that in patriarchal, men-in-charge groups like the Southern Baptists and the Catholic church, it is highly unlikely that there are women on the list of predators. They are much more likely to be victims, along with children of both sexes.You are claiming that vibise believes, "women are never sexual aggressors"?
why can't you people debate in good faith?
What do you define as women?How many women aggressors are on the list released by the Baptists?
I am guessing none given that the Southern Baptists had no women in positions of authority, which is the same for the Catholic church. But maybe you can supply the actual number.
Women?.I never said that women are never sexual abusers, only that in patriarchal, men-in-charge groups like the Southern Baptists and the Catholic church, it is highly unlikely that there are women on the list of predators. They are much more likely to be victims, along with children of both sexes.
You keep claiming your misrepresentations of me are based on your "analysis of my past postings", but your analyses are always wrong, and you can never point to the posts you are "analyzing". How is this not just an attack on me?I am basing my comment on my analysis of her past postings
Your jusgemdnt has proven to be worthless to me. (Your self agrandizement not withstanding)
I live in a world where facts matter, unlike you.She lives in a world where people who disagree with her have no redeeming qualities