This would go along with my last post. You're unwillingness to recognize the evidence that does exist does not mean it doesn't exist.
Again,
There is about as much archaeological and historical evidence for the Book of Mormon as there is for the men and women living on the moon that Joseph Smith taught about (false prophet!)
Still leading with your chin. The statement you made doesn't even I foundation. I don't think anyone knows what Hill Cumorah ur talking about. Hint: the hill in New York is not necessarily the hill being spoken of in the Book of Mormon.
Still responding with lies
Everyone knows that Hill Cumorah in New York is exactly the hill spoken of in the Book of Mormon
Notice the words I bolded, your statement gives you away that you are just attempting to do mormon damage control, more lies
If we're going to be talking about lands, I think there is an North America a Central America and a South America all which seem to be in the Book of Mormon. So there are lands. There are a number of cities and locations and people in the Bible that also have no archaeological evidence to support their existence. It doesn't seem unreasonable that 400 ad to the current date would be sufficient amount of time to lose connections amongst the remaining people who survived to change names. It's my hypothesis that the people who sought to destroy the nephites hated them so much that they wanted to destroy everything that reminded them of the former inhabitants. Evidence that I have uncovered suggests that the mesoamerican people continued their obliteration of nephites moving into North America as far as Canada. So it's not unlikely that we would not be able to find city names that were used by the nephites.
Don't you ever get tired of lying and trying to cover up the
fact that there is no historical nor archaeological evidence?
Joseph Smith referenced the Mississippi River Valley and Eastern United States, and Hill Cumorah
What? You mean found by you? Thank goodness that none of you have been able to get a hold of the book of mormon. You've made a mess of the Bible. I can see that it's actually wisdom in God that he keeps it from you all. As with all things archaeological all you have to do is wait and the evidence will come up. To date there has been no evidence to prove that Book of Mormon false.
Nothing, means you have nothing, period!
What a garbage post
That's good. The Book of Mormon was written and neither Egyptian or Hebrew.
I know, it was written in the King James English
I think you're repeating yourself. Say the same thing using different words and then put another number on it and pretend that it's new. And there's a lot of that here. I mean, how many different ways can we say there's no archaeological evidence?
Right, no archaeological nor historical evidence means it didn't happen, can you say, figment of Joseph Smith's imagination, fiction?
On the order of proof this is insignificant. One could debate if it is even evidence. When you can provide evidence or proof of the Resurrection I will consider wheat as being an issue that might stop one salvation.
Archaeology reveals the truth, and truth is something mormonism doesn't have
Nevertheless, when it comes to archeology, as we have seen with barley, all we have to do is wait and somebody will find it.
I am sure it is there on Hill Cumorah
Where do we find in the Book of Mormon evidence that animals were carrying men? All of this is simply nitpicking and are not evidence or proof that a book is false. Let me know when you've found a cherogrillus, unicorn, or a pygarg. All of these animals are mentioned in the Bible but I'm not aware of any archeological evidence to support their existence.
Of course you know what the book of mormon says, you just like to play games, so I will let you name the book and chapters,
And it came to pass that we did find upon the land of promise, as we journeyed in the wilderness, that there were beasts in the forests of every kind, both the cow and the ox, and the ass and the horse, and the goat and the wild goat, and all manner of wild animals, which were for the use of men. And we did find all manner of ore, both of gold, and of silver, and of copper.
Their land also is full of silver and gold, neither is there any end of their treasures; their land is also full of horses, neither is there any end of their chariots.
Whose arrows shall be sharp, and all their bows bent, and their
horses' hoofs shall be counted like flint, and their wheels like a whirlwind, their roaring like a lion.
And they also had
horses, and asses, and there were elephants and cureloms and cumoms; all of which were useful unto man, and more especially the elephants and cureloms and cumoms.
Is that enough evidence for you???
Still repeating yourself as if you've added something new to the list. While we haven't found a foundry for making steel, we have found steel tools and weapons from that period and location. Where they got it from is a mystery, but u probably know that steel doesn't make itself.
Cumorah is not an issue even if you want it to be. As for chariots, we don't know what that is even if you think u do. Again, we are not required to prove your imagination. It is entirely feasible that it is a wagon with wheels pulled by horses and it would all fit into that era. All we have to do is wait. They are still digging and based on Lidar readings there is a lot of that still to do.
Hill Cumorah is an issue, a big issue and you know it!
RCM