romishpopishorganist
Well-known member
Apparently!That in itself is the FRIGHTENING part. these are JUDGES????
Apparently!That in itself is the FRIGHTENING part. these are JUDGES????
Not where abortion is legal.That would only be true if the unborn child was demanding to live there. Otherwise the baby does have a right
Consent to sex is not consent to delivery.if the woman engaged in am activity that brought about it's existence.
Right but when the elephant goes insane and kills it's handler they same people will not want the elephant not be punished for it's crime.Apparently!
So that unborn child got there on its own? It just appeared out of nowhere and consciously decided to take up residence in an unwilling woman's womb? If that is the case, then you would have a point and I would support abortion right along with you.Unborn children, IMO, should have all the rights that born people have.
Save one: the right to live inside another person.
What's legal and what's right aren't the same. You the discussion from only one perspective.Not where abortion is legal.
It sure is. Consent to sex also is not consent to a sexually transmitted disease but it happens.Consent to sex is not consent to delivery.
Consent to throwing a baseball is not consent to breaking a window. I didn't want to break the window. Paying for it would be an inconvenience.Not where abortion is legal.
Consent to sex is not consent to delivery.
Doesn't matter, to me, how it got there.So that unborn child got there on its own? It just appeared out of nowhere and consciously decided to take up residence in an unwilling woman's womb? If that is the case, then you would have a point and I would support abortion right along with you.
But you know full well that is not what happened. You and every other abortion supporter knows full well how babies are made and from whence they come. Note: storks do not bring babies and just put them in an unwilling woman's womb.
I agree - they aren'tWhat's legal and what's right aren't the same.
And when it does happen, it's treated.It sure is. Consent to sex also is not consent to a sexually transmitted disease but it happens.
It matters to those who seek justice.Doesn't matter, to me, how it got there.
It shouldn't have the right to be there without the pregnant woman's consent.
Ah - so you see giving birth as the woman paying for an unprotected sexual encounter?Consent to throwing a baseball is not consent to breaking a window. I didn't want to break the window. Paying for it would be an inconvenience.
I understand your position. I disagreeI agree - they aren't
My view is that abortion is not wrong, whether or not it is legal.
And when it does happen, it's treated.
You don't see pregnancy as something to be treated?
Well, some pregnant women do, so why should I take your opinion over theirs?
A platitude that can apply to either side.It matters to those who seek justice.
Not to delivering a baby, it's not.Engage in sex is consent.
This, from the person who does not believe there even is a moral code.I agree - they aren't. My view is that abortion is not wrong, whether or not it is legal.
You speak as if pregnancy is a disease. You treat diseases. You treat disorders. Pregnancy is neither a disease or disorder. Unborn children are not diseases. They are not cancers. They are not viruses.And when it does happen, it's treated.
NO! What? Are you just figuring this out?You don't see pregnancy as something to be treated?
Because we do not have right to kill people.Well, some pregnant women do, so why should I take your opinion over theirs?
It is for the woman, and that's whose wellbeing is paramount, to me.I understand your position. I disagree
Killing isn't a treatment.
Eightcrakers seems to have a problem grasping this fundamental point.It matters to those who seek justice.
Engage in sex is consent. Unless that person is mentally challenged.
No... the result..major difference. You understand that correct?Ah - so you see giving birth as the woman paying for an unprotected sexual encounter?
To anyone, really.It is for the woman, and that's whose wellbeing is paramount, to me.
I disagree. This above argument is one sided and that's not just.It is for the woman, and that's whose wellbeing is paramount, to me.
No, he doesn't.No... the result..major difference. You understand that correct?
There are many moral codes.This, from the person who does not believe there even is a moral code.
No, I don't.You speak as if pregnancy is a disease.
If they are inside your body, where abortion is legal, you do have that right.Because we do not have right to kill people.