Theo1689
Well-known member
buried 6 feet under- well done
"buried 6 feet under"?
Can't y'all just feel all the love, charity, compassion, and especially the humility?
And not a speck of boastfullness to be found!
buried 6 feet under- well done
Thank you
I like this one better. No man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him and I will raise him up on the day.
There is no conditional in this sentence as much as you wish to insert it.
I mostly use the KJV and the ESV
when in doubt the NASB
this same person says, "follow me" follow... means... to... go... somewhere... where... the other... is walking.
if not -- you are, "not worthy of Me" ........ not a good idea not to listen to this one who says to follow ....
What does that have to do with someone paying the price for you?
You left off a bit... except when you want "draw" to merely mean "enable".
Or should that be, "unless" you want it to mean "enable"?
And then it cycles back down as it has multiple timesI don't know if you noticed this... But I'm still alive and kicking.
And folks like MacArthur, Begg, and White are still broadcasting.
And I believe Chalc recently posted an article showing that Calvinism has been growing...
Oops!
What does that have to do with someone paying the price for you?"I tell you the truth, if you do not turn
and become as a Child...
you will n e v e r enter the Kingdom of Heaven"
fltom said:
it is how God enables as Jesus stated according to the NIV committee
Theo
Well, they can take it up with the committees behind the ESV, NASB, NET, and NRSV, and others.
Theo
Methinks you shouldn't put all your apologetic eggs in one basket when the term is disputed among the different translations.
fltom said:
and will accept attract
Theo
As long as you understand that "attraction" is 100% efficacious.
It is not some impotent "wooing" or "coaxing".
fltom said:
if you want irresistibilty were here you would have universalism
Theo
That's simply false.
fltom said:
So again you will not be giving the drawing of a mindless sword as an example of what Helko might mean in John 6:44
Theo
I never said anything about "mindless".
But YOU haven't demonstrated that the meaning of "helkuo" is dependent on whether the object drawn has a "mind" or not. It's irrelevant.
fltom said:
God is not unconditionally giving men to Jesus
Theo
Unconditionally to the men, certainly He is.
fltom said:
but giving to jesus those that believe in him (God)
What does that have to do with someone paying the price for you?
By the way, what you quoted is one way of describing repentance, which is a gift from God.
2 Tim. 2:25,26 (EMTV)
25 in meekness instructing those that oppose, if God perhaps may give them repentance, to a full knowledge of the truth,
26 and they regain their senses and escape out of the snare of the devil, having been captured alive by him to do his will.
You mean cherry pick the one most favorable to ypur positon?I use them all
Is there any on this forum that can boast of Greek scholarship on the level of the NIV committee
AmenNo condition on the part of man.
All the actions are done by God.
It does not say the drawing is the enabling. You told a storyYou left off a bit
For a simpler version the NIV
but also use many more
but you are still confused
it is not that drawing means enable
but that drawing is how God enables
I believe I told you that already
Had you not understood
The ESV appears to be excellent as wellI mostly use the KJV and the ESV
when in doubt the NASB
For a simpler version the NIV
but also use many more
Of course there is a conditional, the word "unless"I like this one better. No man can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him and I will raise him up on the day.
There is no conditional in this sentence as much as you wish to insert it.
You have isolated John 6:44.You mean cherry pick the one most favorable to ypur positon?
You will have to ask
Not assumptionI likewise enjoy the irony around his choice of analogies.
And I'm sure you already know this, but what they constantly do is this...
They'll look at John 3:16 and see, "whoever believes in him", and then ASSUME that men naturally have "ability" to believe, even though it's never taught.
They'll look at John 6:44, which ONLY describes the actions of God, and then ASSUME that man has the "ability" not only "to come" of their own accord, but also to choose "not to come", despite the drawing of God.
They ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS assume and project "natural ability and will" onto EVERY Scripture, to preserve their false teaching of "free will".
Yes I like it as wellThe ESV appears to be excellent as well
They are in the next verse you left offNo condition on the part of man.
All the actions are done by God.