Do you have any sort of proof for that?
Do you think it is wrong? Do you have the courage of your convictions, Furion? Can you actually state what your position is here?
Is preventing suffering morally superior to allowing it?
If you are happy to go on record saying it is not, or that you do not know, or whatever your position is, I would be happy to discuss further - perhaps on another thread. But I have a suspicion this is just something you have thrown out to try to trip me up without you actually thinking it through.
Does a mass murderer need his suffering prevented?
I think mass murderers cause much more suffering than they suffer themselves, so the morally right thing to do is to stop the mass murderer. I appreciate they are cases where we have a choice between two options and both involve suffering. Sometimes life is complicated.
But this is about choosing to prevent suffering or just allowing it. Do you choose to prevent childhood cancer, or choose to allow it? Which is morally superior?
If you want to go on record saying you cannot decide, we can discuss further. To me, it seems pretty clear cut.
So you are saying is what other christians tell you, every christian must defend.
Are you saying there is suffering in heaven? Again, my suspicion is that this is just something you have throw out to try to trip me up, rather than because you actually believe it.
Is there suffering in heaven?
If you are prepared to go on record, state your position, and we can discuss. If you are not prepared to do that, I will again assume you agree with me.