You are attempting to warp the terminology. Your falsehoods regarding murder being but one example. You also repeat falsehoods about what pro-choice means, what pro-choice advocates think and say, what abortion is and how it is carried out in most cases. You don't understand the motivations that drive people to abortion or the most effect ways of preventing and reducing abortions.
What do motives driving people to have abortion have to do with anything? Why do I need to understand motives?
It isn't THAT difficult, sir, to prevent abortion. Women have a number of options available to them to avoid pregnancy.
The most effective way to avoid unwanted pregnancy is---not to have sex unless or until you are ready and willing to get pregnant. Short of that, women have the following methods available to them to avoid pregnancy:
1) Contraception
2) Condom use- male, female, or both and
3) Surgery-male, female, or both and
4) All of the above.
This isn't rocket science sir. It really isn.t But abortion supporters have to make it complicated, don't they? The more complicated they can make this, the easier it is to justify abortion. As I said, liberals intelligence is their down fall. They lack common sense.
What if a pregnancy happens anyway and a woman is not prepared to raise a child? Bring the child to term, then put the child up for adoption.
There you have it. Easy peasy. Tell me why we need abortion again---outside of RARE cases of rape, incest, or life of the mother?
Of course they control the agenda. Most people, not just "liberals", but most thinking, ordinary, regular people, know that you are wrong,
Funny you should mention this. Back before Roe was decided in 1973, this was actually true. By this I mean----prior to Roe, one's stance on abortion was not necessarily connected to their political party, nor could one predict what their stance would be on other issues. So---prior to 1973, one could be pro-abortion, yet staunchly Republican. One could be pro-life, yet staunchly Democrat. Or one could be whatever.
Today, at least in American, one's stance on abortion is usually a very accurate indicator of one's ideology and a good indicator of where the person is likely to stand on other serious moral issues. Thus, it is rare to find an abortion supporter who isn't liberal and Democrat--and supports the liberal Democrat agenda. It is rare to find a pro-lifer who is not Republican and conservative and supportive of the Republican agenda.
Where am I getting this from? I read an article on YAHOO. I forget the name and author of the article.
that your arguments don't hold water and that your policies would lead to a huge increase in misery, injury and death if by mischance they were ever carried out. There is a sensible, moral case to be made for limiting abortion very markedly. "It is murdering children" isn't it.
Yes, abortion supporters insist that abortion isn't murder. Yet when pressed as to what happens during an abortion-----they can't tell us without resorting to euphemisms or couching what happens in wonkish medical jargon.