We have different ideas about what is decent. As one would expect as morality is subjective.
With regard to morals, there is no "correct". Everyone has their own ideas about right and wrong, broadly similar in most ways, but clearly different with regard to abortion.
No inconsistencies. I am at least as moral as you are, and I am as entitled to argue my moral case as you are. The person who is most persuasive will prevail. Since most people are intelligent and open to sensible argument, that means that the moral views that prevail will be acceptable to most people, the short hand for which is "decent". There was a time when most people accepted racism and slavery. That time has passed and they were persuaded otherwise. The issue of abortion is settled also, in most places, but remains in flux in the USA. You hope that most people will be persuaded that abortion is wrong. I hope that most will be persuaded that access to abortion is necessary. In time, one moral view or the other will prevail. That doesn't make those on the other side "wrong" objectively. Their views may become unfashionable to the point of being completely unacceptable, such as the views of racists, or they may remain a widely held minority view with hopes of a come back. Time will tell. "Objective morality" will not, and never has, featured in the debate, except as a failed concept brought up to bolster poor arguments.