Reformedguy
Well-known member
Yes you are. I'm patient though. For 40 years Calvinism was the truth. Now it's not. So how can you be sure what you believe now I'd the truth??Here goes the evasion . Stumped again ?
Watch lurkers
Yes you are. I'm patient though. For 40 years Calvinism was the truth. Now it's not. So how can you be sure what you believe now I'd the truth??Here goes the evasion . Stumped again ?
Self examination us good. Try to do better ? Mr 40 years. Or was it 20? NSome ask questions because they know the answer while others ask them to avoid answering them because they don’t know the answers .
hope this helps !!!
Lol, excellent grammar. ???How ever claimed it was the truth ?
Quote me
oops ?
It happens on a phone ?Self examination us good. Try to do better ? Mr 40 years. Or was it 20? N
Lol, excellent grammar. ???
So you used to believe lies but now the truth right? Now you have it figured out. LOLIt happens on a phone ?
but you get the point or do you ?
Of course. LOLEquivocation
You read very badly. It explains your current bad theology.I always prove my point , nothings changed ?
One of many.So your claim of "for over 4 decades" was a ..... an "unreliable" claim by you?
Christ died for the whole world. The whole world needs redemption. 1John 2:2No, it's Calvinism.
He didn't talk about who Christ died for.
He talked about who needed redemption.
Try to pay attention.
AmenChrist died for the whole world. The whole world needs redemption. 1John 2:2
Define truth . I’ll get the popcorn ? ready .
This is like asking @Carbon to define the gospel yesterday, I’m still waiting for a definition. As RC Sproul said 90% of seminary students cannot define the gospel .
hope this helps !!!
For what purpose?Christ died for the whole world. The whole world needs redemption. 1John 2:2
What does that accomplish?Propitiation
next
Great. From your perspective what is accomplished by propitiationPropitiation vs. Expiation- The New Testament usage of hilaskomai and hilasmos, consistent with its precedent usage in the Greek Old Testament, speaks consistently of God’s atoning action in Christ directed toward sin on behalf of sinners, not human action directed toward God to satisfy God. The criterion for interpretation, Stott has said, “is whether the object of the atoning action is God or man.” “Propitiation” indicates an action by humans directed toward God, and “expiation” indicates an action by God toward sin and sinners. According to Stott's criterion, these texts favor "expiation" over “propitiation.” Given the choice of translating hilastērion either “propitiation” or “expiation,” therefore, “expiation” is preferable based on the textual evidence of both the New Testament and the Greek Old Testament. James Dunn summarizes well the case for preferring “expiation” to “propitiation” as a translation for hilastērion: Darrin W. Snyder Belousek, Atonement, Justice, and Peace: The Message of the Cross and the Mission of the Church (Grand Rapids, MI; Cambridge, U.K.: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012), 247–252.
hope this helps !!!