No, it was not. If it was you would have shown where he called someone to be a Christian.
Well, since you obviously don't read the Bible:
And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers.
And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men. And they straightway left their nets, and followed him. And going on from thence, he saw other two brethren, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and
he called them. And they immediately left the ship and their father, and followed him. (Mat 4:18-22)
The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and
saith unto him, Follow me. (Joh 1:43)
And as he passed by, he saw Levi the son of Alphaeus sitting at the receipt of custom, and
said unto him, Follow me. And he arose and followed him. (Mar 2:14)
Bold emphasis added.
Six examples, six disciples called. Exactly as I said. Do you need more to correct your incorrect statement?
Again your point does show that Jews must relinquish their religion.
And? I thought that was quite clear. I got in this because most of those points require rejection of Jesus as Messiah or acceptance of Jesus as Messiah and a Jew who accepts Jesus as Messiah is a Christian. There could be some discussion of what things God commanded of the Jews that should be followed, but those fall under Romans 14 IMO.
No, you cannot. A jew is a follower of the Torah. That means they must obey all the Torah. One is not born obeying anything. one must be taught to obey. Culture can be picked up here and there. For example, wearing a skullcap does not make one a Jew.
Well, a number of people, including Jews, disagree with your rejection. Yes, that does include Jews who identify as Christian because they accept Jesus as Messiah.
Just because a cat is born in an oven does not make it bread. Even if you call him bread.
And that is total nonsense, woke progressive 1984 newspeak type nonsense.
Nobody is calling the "cat" "bread".
Instead they speak of different types of "cats", but you insist it is all about "bread" in your own little definition.
He was a Jew by faith, birth and culture. He would disagree with your claims.
That is rubbish Jews are followers of a religion. There is no DNA for that.
The DNA is for the fact that they are an ethnicity as well as a religion.
People are not born Jews, that is like saying one is born Catholic or Muslim or Hindu.
You obviously don't know any Jews at all, because they will tell you differently. Including secular Jews and Jews who embrace Jesus as Messiah and are now Christians.
Andrew Klavan speech
So cats born in ovens are now bread? If a baby is born in an ambulance is that baby an American emergency vehicle?
No, you are simply trying to use newspeak definitions to redefine what the meaning of is is. Or vaccine. Or recession. Or definition.