The Climate Is So Bad..........


Between 1966 and 2015, all of the 25 glaciers in the park got smaller. Some lost as much as 80% of their area, with average loss of 40%.

How can you deny that this is a major loss of glacier number and size?

If you have alternative numbers, post them.

That the date of the complete loss of all glaciers was premature, we are clearly on the path to that result.
So do you contend that there was absolutely zero climate change before the industrial revolution?

OR phrased another way, Do you believe that if humans did not exist that there would be no climate change?
 

Between 1966 and 2015, all of the 25 glaciers in the park got smaller. Some lost as much as 80% of their area, with average loss of 40%.

How can you deny that this is a major loss of glacier number and size?

If you have alternative numbers, post them.

That the date of the complete loss of all glaciers was premature, we are clearly on the path to that result.
Greenland's glazier is growing.
I bet the next claim will be that isn't good.
You can't win with ignorant people. Glazier increase is bad, glazier melt is bad.
 
LMBO so its just a matter of continuing to kick the can down the road. Got it.

Hey why dont you want men to have the same choice as you demand for women? You hate equality just admit it. You hate men, just admit it. Why cant you people just be honest? Its not like people will respect you more if youre honest but maybe they might not think left wingers are so sleazy.
Men have a choice whenever they face the decision of whether to have unprotected sex. If they go ahead, they should support any baby that results.
 
Men have a choice whenever they face the decision of whether to have unprotected sex. If they go ahead, they should support any baby that results.
Are you saying that in 100 percent of the time that women have no control over whether to have six?
 
So do you contend that there was absolutely zero climate change before the industrial revolution?

OR phrased another way, Do you believe that if humans did not exist that there would be no climate change?
The unprecedented level of climate change we have been experiencing in recent decades is clearly the consequence of human activity.

This is the conclusion of all of the professional organizations of scientists in the relevant fields.

The people who deny this are fossil fuel industry apologists and the politicians they bought.
 
So do you contend that there was absolutely zero climate change before the industrial revolution?

OR phrased another way, Do you believe that if humans did not exist that there would be no climate change?
not at the degree

It is not what I "believe" it is what science has concluded.
 
Firstly we were not pumping out the amount of carbon dioxide and other pollutants at earlier periods in human society as we are today and secondly the human population of the planet was a great deal smaller. Your comments are uninformed and somewhat ignorant.
well the comments aren't uninformed, the climate has changed considerably even in the last several centuries, but we can also see it in the geology for example the Devonian period.
I would tend to agree with however that we are pumping massive amounts of carbon dioxide and pollutants, and it is likely it is causing drastic climate change.

My issue is with the fads to try and change it. For example, if we cut down on meat by changing animal husbandry we can increase dramatically the level of carbon dioxide retention in the soil. So sure vegan if you want, and eat insects but the fads aren't necessarily going to solve the problem.
Shop locally with seasonal only vegetables.

Trying to change people's habits is impossible, people will go for whatever self gratifies them
 
The unprecedented level of climate change we have been experiencing in recent decades is clearly the consequence of human activity.

This is the conclusion of all of the professional organizations of scientists in the relevant fields.

The people who deny this are fossil fuel industry apologists and the politicians they bought.
Are these organizations right 100 percent of the time

And link to documents that give the reasons those who disagree give as their motivation.
 
On technical issues that require years of study and training to gain expertise, yes.

Or should we instead trust the bloviations of the local car mechanic?

So if these scientists had done just one more experiment, they would have not made these mistakes.
 
My pattern recognizes gradations, and flaws, but also recognizes that training and experience and study trump ignorance.
Your previous post negates this comment.

And thanks for the evidence that Trump occupies every thought that you have.
 
Back
Top