It's not about "who".
Scientific journals provide the critical function of peer review and communication to other scientists in specialized fields.
Asking for help in finding a publication written by a scientist for a report relevant to climate change, and providing a list of journals already searched, is not the same as a premise that provides a limited choice between two exhaustive or exclusive alternatives ( a false dichotomy).
It's simply a request for further information.
I am familiar: William Hughes, et. al,
"Critical Thinking An Introduction to the Basic Skills", 6th ed., Broadview press, page 146
People like me? If you mean people that have also worked as a scientist and published in the field of physics, then yes, people like me. Scientific journals exist to provide a record that ensures scholarly standards up to and including specific scientific methodology as determined by subject matter experts.
Be careful when using the term, "impossible". Newer research has provided results with considerably less ambiguity.
What's real is that teams of scientists have significantly reduced the uncertainty between natural and human caused atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations based on data from NASA's OCO-2 instrument on the Orbiting Carbon Observatory satellite. This data provided a substantial baseline in determining the effect of human emission activities and comparing them to naturally caused emissions.
___