I notice that you do not mention hurricane severity. Why not?
My Hurricane Ian Prediction
- Thread starter stiggy wiggy
- Start date
Gondwanaland
Well-known member
But it doesn't. That's what some extreme CAGWers predict, but that's not what we currently observable see
Gondwanaland
Well-known member
There is. You just declare them all climate deniers because they do not adhere to your Holy Doctrine of CAGW and follow the teachings of your CAGW bishops.
Indeed, many scientists have come forward pointing out the absurdity of the models and the baked in heating that when used on past data shows more warming than what we even experienced in the real world.
Blah blah blah, just another word for "heretic" for your religion
Clear as mud. Obama and Co. are so worried about climate change and water rising that they all bought mansions on the water.....the foolish fall for their fear porn.
Gondwanaland
Well-known member
And high damage, etc. today could simply reflect there being more structures and places to be damaged as there are more people.
No, they haven't.
IT's your side screeching about 'settled science' when there is no such thing.
You mean like we would all be dead by 2000 and all the ice caps would melt and states wiped out? Yea, science.
More deaths occur in the aftermath of many nowdays....fact. Because of foolish things like putting a generator too close to your house and dying from that.
18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year
Tomorrow (Monday, April 22) is Earth Day 2019 and time for my annual Earth Day post on spectacularly wrong predictions around the time of the first Earth Day in 1970….. In the May 2000 issue of Reason Magazine, award-winning science correspondent Ronald Bailey wrote an excellent article titled...
www.aei.org
The track record of climate scientists.
So much for settled science.18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year
Tomorrow (Monday, April 22) is Earth Day 2019 and time for my annual Earth Day post on spectacularly wrong predictions around the time of the first Earth Day in 1970….. In the May 2000 issue of Reason Magazine, award-winning science correspondent Ronald Bailey wrote an excellent article titled...
The track record of climate scientists.
Furion
Well-known member
The climate changes every year, sure.
Hot air no evidence, as to be expected
stiggy wiggy
Well-known member
If these libs are successful and they are able to stop the climate from changing, I hope they don't do it in the winter. I'd hate to have it be permanently cold.
Furion
Well-known member
They are doing a how-cold-can-we-stand-it test in Europe this winter.
However they are also burning trees...holy trees....excuse me, they changed the name to "biomass fuel" so Greta doesn't have a cow.
stiggy wiggy
Well-known member
How DAAAH you?
Well, where are the links, and why aren't these dissenting views presented on the websites of the AGU or NAS or other professional organizations of relevant scientists?
The scientists I have seen come forward to object tend to specialize in irrelevant fields and have failed to publish their analyses.
The data overwhelmingly disputes what you say.
Well, yes, there is such a thing as settled science. Would anyone get on a plane if aerodynamics was not considered settled?
And yes, as more data is accumulated, the conclusions of climate science are more supported.
Sure, in the earlier days of this field, predictions were wrong, but the trendlines were right. The ice caps and glaciers are melting, the seas are rising, farming is having to adapt and animals are migrating to different climes.
This is a relatively young field, and a lot of data can be accumulated in 50 years, along with changes in models.18 spectacularly wrong predictions made around the time of first Earth Day in 1970, expect more this year
Tomorrow (Monday, April 22) is Earth Day 2019 and time for my annual Earth Day post on spectacularly wrong predictions around the time of the first Earth Day in 1970….. In the May 2000 issue of Reason Magazine, award-winning science correspondent Ronald Bailey wrote an excellent article titled...
The track record of climate scientists.