Bob Carabbio
Well-known member
But she didn't have a CLUE about what Jesus REAL AGENDA was going to be (SIN offering). It took the disciples by surprise too.Wasn't Mary given a little "heads up" when she has her talk with Gabriel? Luke 1:26-38
But she didn't have a CLUE about what Jesus REAL AGENDA was going to be (SIN offering). It took the disciples by surprise too.Wasn't Mary given a little "heads up" when she has her talk with Gabriel? Luke 1:26-38
You are the one who made statements to the effect that some people have a closer connection and/or understanding of the Bible than others and that the Bible doesn't pertain to everyone. Wouldn't the logic you appear to be using here coupled with this statement mean that you should think that the Bible doesn't pertain to anyone today?The term "Jew" in a modern context is not the same in that ancient context,
In what context?do you know what a "Judean" is?
It didn't. It's still there in Hebrew. If that's not what you meant, you shouldn't expect words translated into another language to have the same form and/or sounds.Why did the "D" drop out of Jew?
No. Not even close.In fact, JEW sounds like it could be a transliteration of YHWH.
You are the one who made statements to the effect that some people have a closer connection and/or understanding of the Bible than others and that the Bible doesn't pertain to everyone. Wouldn't the logic you appear to be using here coupled with this statement mean that you should think that the Bible doesn't pertain to anyone today?
In what context?
It didn't. It's still there in Hebrew. If that's not what you meant, you shouldn't expect words translated into another language to have the same form and/or sounds.
No. Not even close.
No. Both terms are derived from the name Judah.Judea is "Jew-dea", so the term "Jew" is part of the word that is YHWH, which means Jews are calling themselves Yahweh or declaring themselves to be God.
Are you saying the NT teaches that Jesus was a human sacrifice to God for the remission of our sins ?But she didn't have a CLUE about what Jesus REAL AGENDA was going to be (SIN offering). It took the disciples by surprise too.
so some one has a jewish ape bodyThe term "half sibling" would suggests illegitimate child or that the parents committed adultery. Perhaps the family wasn't Jewish.
we know they were cursed and didn’t listen to Him.Nobody knows who wrote the Hebrew Bible and they are also deceased.
any one can declare nonsense all day...and try to make judah be this or that...Judea is "Jew-dea", so the term "Jew" is part of the word that is YHWH, which means Jews are calling themselves Yahweh or declaring themselves to be God.
Anyone who claims that "judah" [sic] has nothing to do with "judaism" [sic] is spouting nonsense. "IEUE" has nothing to do with either Christianity or Judaism.any one can declare nonsense all day...and try to make judah be this or that...
judah and IEUE have nothing to do with judaism.
any one can declare nonsense all day...and try to make judah be this or that...
judah and IEUE have nothing to do with judaism.
what i meant is in the other realityJudah went defunct in 135 CE , which means in 135 CE the Jews were rebranded Palestinians, therefore Judaism should be called Palestinianism,
But it also seems that Mary DIDN'T HAVE A CLUE what Jesus' REAL MINISTRY was. It appears that the Sanhedron, and the jews in general thought that "Messiah" would ride in on a big white horse, Destroy the oppressive Roman occupying forces, and restore Israel back to it's glory as it was when Solomon was running things.Sounds like it....but Jesus' mother Mary knew the truth.
She'd been given insider information cf. Luk 2:33.But it also seems that Mary DIDN'T HAVE A CLUE what Jesus' REAL MINISTRY was.
It appears that the Sanhedron, and the jews in general thought that "Messiah" would ride in on a big white horse, Destroy the oppressive Roman occupying forces, and restore Israel back to it's glory as it was when Solomon was running things.
Being "Born Again of the Spirit", "Dying to self" and being CLEANSED of their sin (not just having it covered) wasn't even on the radar for them.
And probably didn't really understand ANY of it until AFTER Calvary.She'd been given insider information cf. Luk 2:33.
Pure speculation on your part.And probably didn't really understand ANY of it until AFTER Calvary.
None of the other kids took Jesus seriously. Why do you suppose THAT was??? They grew up with Him after all.Pure speculation on your part.
They hadn't heard the prophecies of Anna and Simeon etc, nor had the visitations of Magi and shepherds, and knew nothing of the virgin birth.None of the other kids took Jesus seriously. Why do you suppose THAT was??? They grew up with Him after all.
So Mary NEVER SPOKE WITH HER KIDS, and never told them about Jesus birth???They hadn't heard the prophecies of Anna and Simeon etc, nor had the visitations of Magi and shepherds, and knew nothing of the virgin birth.