I didn't call you a genius, Sheldon. I was employing sarcasm ?Thanks for calling me a genius, I'm not really even though that's what it looks like, what with you being educated in America.
I didn't call you a genius, Sheldon. I was employing sarcasm ?Thanks for calling me a genius, I'm not really even though that's what it looks like, what with you being educated in America.
Good grief, you actually think I think you did. Not very sharp, are you.I didn't call you a genius, Sheldon. I was employing sarcasm ?
No, genius, not at all ...Good grief, you actually think I think you did. Not very sharp, are you.
Good you can admit you're not very sharp, it's the first step to a more sane you. Hopefully.No, genius ...
Again, get on that reading comprehension problem you have as soon as possible, slick ...Good you can admit you're not very sharp, it's the first step to a more sane you. Hopefully.
You said that before. You're not very original are you.Again, get on that reading comprehension problem you have as soon as possible, slick.
You said that before ...You said that before. You're not very original are you.
Did your school report say, must try harder?You said that before ...
I would ask about the risks and benefits of taking Remdesivir for Covid. The risks and benefits for Remdisivir for Ebola aren't relevant, especially since the study did not say that Remdseivir caused a problem in and of itself, merely that it wasn't effective against Ebola.Okay. What do you think the study says. Or, perhaps more importantly, what would you do if you had just that information and you were hospitalized with Covid? What questions would you ask if they wanted to give you or a family member Remdesivir?
The study did not say that they died from Remdesivir.How many people in the study died before Remdesivir was pulled and how many people died being treated by Remdesivir from Covid? What is the percentage of both and what did they die from? Because if they died from Remdesivir it doesn't matter what they were being treated for.
My physician's told me Remdesivir is very risky and damaging to the kidneys.I would ask about the risks and benefits of taking Remdesivir for Covid. The risks and benefits for Remdisivir for Ebola aren't relevant, especially since the study did not say that Remdseivir caused a problem in and of itself, merely that it wasn't effective against Ebola.
Why did you bring up that study about Remdesivir? Also, you provided the study as a source directly after you said that Remdesivir causes acute kidney failure, leaving the implication that that study claimed that Remdesivir causes kidney failure. Do you retract that implication about that study and Remdesivir and kidney failure?
The study did not say that they died from Remdesivir.
4.0 student here.Did your school report say, must try harder?
"Devout" and "evolutionist" are incompatible concepts.Because devout evolutionists are childish and whiny as their posted responses show.
If you're not lying, as your usual posting style would not eliminate.4.0 student here.
Who says?"Devout" and "evolutionist" are incompatible concepts.
The dictionary ….Who says?
Evolutionist -
a person who believes in the theories of evolution and natural selection.
Devout - having or showing deep religious feeling or commitment.
"she was a devout Catholic"
Not since boys can be girls, and girls can be boys they aren't, you devout, religious fanatic. ?"Devout" and "evolutionist" are incompatible concepts.
Quote it saying you cannot be a devout evolutionistThe dictionary ….
An odd request. Dictionary's deal with the definition of words, they don't deal with discussing ideas.Post it saying you cannot be a devout evo
So it does not actually say that then.An odd request. Dictionary's deal with the definition of words, they don't deal with discussing ideas.
However, if someone believes the theory of evolution they do so because of scientific reasons such as evidence, not religious feeling or commitment which the word devout is about, as per the dictionary.
My guess is you think people adhere to evolution not for good reasons of evidence, in which case you would be wrong. By all means say if I have you wrong.
Of course not, it wouldn't say it nor would it say the opposite. That it doesn't is irrelevant to the point in hand.So it does not actually say that then.