Bob Carabbio
Well-known member
Whether it's actually true or not, nobody appears to know, but HEY!!!! THIS IS THE INTERNET!!!'This must be aired and debated immediately'
THE SKY IS FALLING!!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
Whether it's actually true or not, nobody appears to know, but HEY!!!! THIS IS THE INTERNET!!!'This must be aired and debated immediately'
English sport is fox and hounds,'This must be aired and debated immediately'
The well-established link between the COVID-19 mRNA shots and blood clots, myocarditis, heart attacks and strokes is reason enough to stop the vaccine program, argues a London oncologist.
And further, the average age of death from COVID-19 in the United Kingdom is 82, which is higher than the age for all other causes, 81.
But there is another reason enough to halt the shots, wrote Dr. Angus Dalgleish, professor of Oncology at St. George's University of London, in a letter to the British Medical Journal.
Copy/pasteThe process referred to is LINE-1 mediated retrotransposition. LINE-1 is a set of retrotransposons that exist in thousands of copies in our cells. They appear to be primitive retroviruses and encode a reverse transcriptase-type of polymerase that converts RNA into DNA that can then insert into random spots in our genomes. This happens every so often, most notably converting the processed mRNAs produced by our cellular genes back into DNA; genomic integrations of these DNAs are termed pseudogenes. It is not surprising that this could also happen with an mRNA vaccine, but the vaccine mRNA does not last long in our bodies, is not widespread and so the number of pseudogenes created from the vaccine would be tiny compared with the cellular mRNAs.
This is not something to be concerned about.
The only ones taking risks when it comes to the shots is the person receiving the injection. Everyone else has liability protection meaning immune from prosecution. That is the only immunity to anything related to the shots under the Prep act enacted by Azar under Trump.Why should they present evidence that the general public would not understand? The "actual observation" was misrepresented, showing how easy it is to be misled in a technical field in which you are not an expert.
Fauci the teflon bureaucrat. TV star and diva."
fauchee doesn't see patients.
But you have yet to post anything that would support your claims of being a scientist as well as the numerous other unrelated professions you also claim. I gather you have at least 6 graduate degrees and experience in at least that many fields, based on your claims.I posted fauchee was a Quack. Feb 2020. I am an actual scientist in more fields than you and fauchee combined. You didn't listen
In December 2020 you said mike Mann won Nobel prize, He lied about it under oath. You listened to a liar. I have evidence where he lied.
OKI am a Christian, and a Catholic at that. And nothing I wrote in that post is contrary to Catholic teaching. But if you are assessing Christianity based on the sampling available in this one forum, I can only say that the sample is not very scientific and is not representative of Christianity overall. In fact, using any kind of social media to sample such a population is unlikely to be truly representative.
No.Copy/paste
I was raised Catholic and went to a Catholic high school where I took my first biology class and decided that this was for me.OK
Catholicism is crazy, but kind of “good, old fashioned crazy.” I know you guys accept science, unlike the Evangelicals
OK what role did common descent have in the development of the C19 shots? How is you believing you are an ape and have mystery nonhuman common ancestors with tails play in the development of the cancer treatments?I was raised Catholic and went to a Catholic high school where I took my first biology class and decided that this was for me.
I majored in biology in a Catholic college where the biology dept chair was a nun. Never heard a word about creationism, but lots about the role of evolution in biology.
When it comes to science, Catholics are more mainstream. When it comes to reproductive issues, not so much.
The PREP act was a necessary step to ensure action timely enough to save lives at risk during a public health emergency. Note: the liability protection is not protection against ignoring regulations or proven fraud in the approval process. These are still prosecutable. The only protection is against unforeseen consequences that might occur, despite proper clinical trials. Thankfully, there were no significant unforeseen consequences to the vaccines. It was at least as successful as the flu vaccine that we regularly get every year.I also questioned, and felt it was wrong to grant liability protection to the vaccine developers and all health agencies,
If you look at published work on coronaviruses, you will routinely find phylogenetic trees that determine evolutionary relationships, and where and when specific functional variations were acquired.OK what role did common descent have in the development of the C19 shots? How is you believing you are an ape and have mystery nonhuman common ancestors with tails play in the development of the cancer treatments?
Almost all in biology can be done independent of common ancestors beliefs. It is a wastes of class time and a waste of money for the student who obtains no benefit in mythical beliefs in common ancestors that connect humans and apes. Human are not apes just because some bozos classify them as such.
What emergency? It was concocted based on lies.The PREP act was a necessary step to ensure action timely enough to save lives at risk during a public health emergency.
Hope you are right because there is plenty of fraudNote: the liability protection is not protection against ignoring regulations or proven fraud in the approval process.
Not really. If they were then they would be prosecuted and Pfizer would be bankrupt.These are still prosecutable.
Clinical trials speaking of fraud.The only protection is against unforeseen consequences that might occur, despite proper clinical trials.
Only if you stick your head where the sun does not shine.Thankfully, there were no significant unforeseen consequences to the vaccines.
Successful in making billionaires out of for profit companies. How many new billionaires were created from the shots? You are brainwashed and have been smoked on more that a few times here.It was at least as successful as the flu vaccine that we regularly get every year.
Six claims with no support whatsoever. Do you know how to debate? You don't do it by just claiming things.What emergency? It was concocted based on lies.
Hope you are right because there is plenty of fraud
Not really. If they were then they would be prosecuted and Pfizer would be bankrupt.
Clinical trials speaking of fraud.
Only if you stick your head where the sun does not shine.
Successful in making billionaires out of for profit companies. How many new billionaires were created from the shots? You are brainwashed and have been smoked on more that a few times here.
You don't look at my links anyway. That precedent was established so there is no debate with the brainwashed who refuse to look at opposing viewpoints. So don't go coming on here and referencing debate. All the facts bounce off your head.Six claims with no support whatsoever. Do you know how to debate? You don't do it by just claiming things.
Who cares. They don't need trees.If you look at published work on coronaviruses, you will routinely find phylogenetic trees that determine evolutionary relationships, and where and when specific functional variations were acquired.
Probably not in dispute even by 6 day creationists. What is in dispute is human/ape ancestry. You failed to addressAnalysis of the evolution of viral gene products that interact with human proteins identifies the specific sites of interaction on those proteins (through measurable positive selection), sites that are then chosen for targeting by therapeutic drugs.
OpinionWithout evolution, biology is just a bunch of unrelated factoids.
OpinionEvolution ties it all together into a comprehensive and understandable pattern.
What emergency? COVID lockdowns based on lies. Imperial college. It never had to happen and was mostly designed to destroy Trump economy in an election year.Six claims with no support whatsoever.
You come on here with these ignorant claims that they can be sued then why is nobody suing them? Because they have in effect absolute liability protection. Otherwise lawyers would be after them like white on rice.Do you know how to debate? You don't do it by just claiming things.
How many claims with no support? Do you know how to debate? I already provided a link to youThe PREP act was a necessary step to ensure action timely enough to save lives at risk during a public health emergency. Note: the liability protection is not protection against ignoring regulations or proven fraud in the approval process. These are still prosecutable. The only protection is against unforeseen consequences that might occur, despite proper clinical trials. Thankfully, there were no significant unforeseen consequences to the vaccines. It was at least as successful as the flu vaccine that we regularly get every year.
You can ignore the truth all you want.Whether it's actually true or not, nobody appears to know, but HEY!!!! THIS IS THE INTERNET!!!
THE SKY IS FALLING!!!! THE SKY IS FALLING!!!
Well said.Oncologists hunt and fight cancer. Pfizer wishin' for blind oncologists that can't read their labs. Blind pathologists that can't see tissue from biopsies.
I do look at your links, and then I debunk them, if appropriate. You must not confuse debunking with refusing to look. Anyway, I assume that like all of us here, you are writing to a larger audience - not just to me personally. Even if you think I am brainwashed and ignore your links, you ought to consider the rest of the readers here whom you might like to convince.You don't look at my links anyway. That precedent was established so there is no debate with the brainwashed who refuse to look at opposing viewpoints. So don't go coming on here and referencing debate. All the facts bounce off your head.
Opinion. Covid lockdowns were limited in both scope and duration. If you want to see what a REAL lockdown looks like, look at China today. That is a real lockdown. We never did anything like that. Each state made their own lockdown decisions in the spring of 2020. It was not a coordinated effort from one central evil intelligence as you might believe. Democrats and Republicans alike, and independents too were responsible for making to decisions. Oh, and Trump destroyed himself. He didn't need any help from some imaginary conspiracy.What emergency? COVID lockdowns based on lies. Imperial college. It never had to happen and was mostly designed to destroy Trump economy in an election year.
Because they have not violated any of the terms I mentioned.You come on here with these ignorant claims that they can be sued then why is nobody suing them?
Nope. Limited liability protection. Without that protection they would still be testing vaccines and instead of 1.09 million dead we would have probably over 3 million dead. Those 2 million people who are still alive because of the PREP act and all their loved ones are thankful the vaccine was released when it was. China, which has for political reasons refused to accept western mRMA vaccines, is now busy trying to develop their own mRNA vaccine after seeing the dismal failure of their zero-covid strategy. We did it right. The rest of the world follows.Because they have in effect absolute liability protection.
Do you mean the "theyliedpeopledied.com" link showing excess deaths? Yes, I remember that link well, and I responded in great deal on how that graph does not show a correlation between shots and excess deaths. But instead of defending your link, you abandoned that and went on to some other source. It does not look very good in a debate if you abandon your first attempt the minute it is challenged and jump over to something brand new.How many claims with no support? Do you know how to debate? I already provided a link to you
The correlation between guns and mass murders
I have told you that I do not follow any particular source, I take the amalgamation of sources. I know that does not fit your preconceived narrative that you want to believe, but I do not care Won't you please pick a source so the narrative can engage it? We've determined all the bad...forums.carm.org
I generally ignore personal tweets from people with no expertise in the field in which they are tweeting.by Kennedy as it relates to pharma protection and you ignored it. Here it is again