Recent content by Andreas

I'll give examples of animals that contradict the nested hierarchy when I have more time. It's not difficult or rare. In fact, most animals don't fit. For now, I just want to respond to your notion that creationists supposedly believe Chimp DNA would be closer to gorilla. Not sure why, but if...

The proteins that the DNA codes for must be translated first. In other words, the DNA bases is symbolic as it represents the information to construct proteins which form the structure and function of all your cells. The relationship between the nucleotide sequences of genes and amno acid...

DNA stores genetic information. It is a four-letter alphabet of nucleotide bases (ACGT) that spell out three letter codons make di Is it possible to be an evolutionists without lying about evolution? I think you've been deceived by evolutionists. No one doubts that small changes due to...

Study the processes of cellular metabolism and DNA and RNA and get back to me. That you would question that DNA is a code is silly.

No, DNA sequences don't form by random chemical processes. That's the main point!!! Mixing chemicals together doesn't form DNA sequences on their own. This is a huge problem for OoL researchers. The pre-existing parent cell replicates the DNA. What you are saying is silly wrong.

DNA is code. Spare me any silly argument to the contrary. If you get new code, that is new specified complexity. New code produces a new output. Copying code, breaking code, tweaking a code that doesn't change its output is not new specified complexity. DNA is code. Spare me any silly...

See my longer response. They did notice a morphological hierarchy, like you would at a car dealership. But the genetics is much messier.

Good ole Theobald, my friend. Do you know if he has done anything new lately? His old site is getting stale. The nested hierarchy thing is getting worse for him all the time. An evolutionist could decide to group phyla according to early developmental processes, or according to symmetry, they...

You're being too narrow in your philosophy here. What hard evidence are your inferences based upon? Do you have one example where new intelligence (specified complexity) originated without intentional design? Your second inference assumes a closed system where life exists, and no other life...

Do you have an example specifically where an accumulation of mutations goes beyond just making two groups that were the same species unable to breed? Any novel organs? Any new specified information in the DNA?

Yes, and it must be noted that different areas of science use different tools and inferences. Different doesn't necessarily make them wrong, it's just that the tools have to be different. Sometimes the fields and tools overlap. For example, forensic science has tools, and its scientists make...

The point is that gravity can be observed and tested with improved instruments but that can't be done with evolution. The above-mentioned evolutionists were not lone incidents by outlier scientists. These were the leaders and shakers of major institutions and/or internationally known authors...

Thanks for the like Caroljeen. So often people judge Oneness theology on the misinformation of Trinitarian preachers that are misinformed about it and spread misinformation. Trinitarian pastors function as a sort of deep state of Christianity today.

I should not post that late in the day while doing other things. Let's clarify. I recall years ago the head of the NCS, Eugenie Scott, made the comparison between evolution and gravity. Furthermore, she distinguished between the "fact of evolution" and the theories of evolution. She said...

EES theories do indeed struggle to explain biological change. Everything that is observed has never been observed to do that much. Someone could come along someday and long jump 55 feet. Unless you can show me that it can't happen under absolutely no circumstances, then it is a fact that 55...