Recent content by Cisco Qid

  1. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Nuff said, your squirming is too painful to watch.
  2. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    It is not a prediction if it is an unpredicted observation. IC is observed in both cases. Behe sees it as it as a challenge to gradualism as predicted by evolution while Muller simply publishes the observation which you refuse to quote out of fear of eating your own words. I shouldn't have to...
  3. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    I had looked at it and it was void of predictions which is not uncommon for most publications. Now all you have to do is point to the text that you believe mimics ID predictions. A cut and paste would do it. And, BTW, Irreducible Complexity is not a prediction it is physical evidence unless...
  4. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    I see that your remedial reading skills are still not working. In order to show which is better from the same predictions, you need to show that they make the same predictions. This is something you keep bobbing and weaving over and fail to address in a sensible manner and no amount of muddying...
  5. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Wrong on so many levels. First of all, I posted a set of testable predictions made by ID to which you responded that evolution has made these same predictions. I naturally responded that you should point to where evolution published these same predictions. You listed a document in which I found...
  6. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    You say that you can provide a whole lot of things. For instance, evolution predictions that mimic ID predictions but all we ever see is bobbing and weaving.
  7. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    What's the difference, you can't do either one. It's like the two guys having the following conversation: First guy: Remember the the time that you couldn't do 5 push ups. Second guy: It was 10 push ups, I couldn't to 10 pushups. First guy: What the difference, you stopped at two.
  8. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    So I call your secular mob a bunch of biased atheists and right away that confirms that ID is religiously biased and not scientific. Do you you guys even hear yourselves. First of all I am not an ID associate but rather an interested observer so that anything that I say should not confirm nor...
  9. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Get back to me when you find those predictions you promised.
  10. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    There are a mob of secularists whose religious atheistic bias has eliminated ID as an option. "There are multiple hubs of ID-related research. Biologic Institute, led by molecular biologist Doug Axe, is “developing and testing the scientific case for intelligent design in biology.” Biologic...
  11. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    You place too much stock on Dover. This is allowing the court room of law to arbitrate where experimentation and the laboratory should be doing the talking. A scientifically illiterate judge Jones should not be a deciding factor in science. Laugh is the right phrase.
  12. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Simply making negative assertions without addressing any of the points does not make your argument or the case for evolution any more plausible. Wrong again, function in junk DNA was predicted by ID long before ENCODE. In fact, an increase in functionality is an ID prediction in general. It is...
  13. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Why don't you just admit that I caught you in a misstatement? All this worming around is painful to watch for anybody that happens to be listening in and it sure doesn't help your case.
  14. C

    Single best evidence for common descent

    Now all you have to do is go the next step and quote the predictions that mimic ID predictions. Or is that too much to ask? Even a judge will ask a litigant to underline or quote the phrases that apply to their point even though the judge has full access to the entire document.
Top