Recent content by Cisco Qid

  1. C

    A positive case for ID other than critizing evolution

    I agree with you. I suspect that many evolutionists don't really believe their own theory and it just the alternative that they find hard to accept.
  2. C

    A positive case for ID other than critizing evolution

    I believe that you are correct. I picked a specified sequence that has extremely low kolgomorov complexity and in general specified sequences have lower KC values than random sequences while a truly random sequence would not be compressible. I could have picked a random sequence before the toss...
  3. C

    Intelligent Design as a Fruitful Scientific Paradigm: Paleontology

    A response to Larry Moran from the DI. https://evolutionnews.org/2015/11/from_biochemist/
  4. C

    A positive case for ID other than critizing evolution

    You have to read it according to what it says not what you want it to say. "When an intelligent agent acts, "it chooses from a range...to create CSI...". An accident is not choosing from a range to create CSI but rather is a random event involving an intelligent agent. Humans have the highest...
  5. C

    A positive case for ID other than critizing evolution

    To the possible chagrin of some fellow Christians on this forum, ID is not about faith. Although it is more palatable to those of faith than the alternative, it is strictly based on observation and hypothesis based on those observations. IOW, it does not use scripture as an authoritative source...
  6. C

    A positive case for ID other than critizing evolution

    The scientific theory of Intelligent Design does more than simply criticize evolution, it presents a positive case for design. Link
  7. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    A totally unprovoked and viciously unmerited attack - I like it.
  8. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    I realized that after I posted it. Unfortunately, it would not allowed me to reedit the post. But it is interesting to observe the response. And I am no expert.
  9. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    Wrong is an awfully strong word for someone who just discovered that a few fossilized fauna survived into the Cambrian period. You do realize that fauna are plants don't you?
  10. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    The concept of the broken gene is following along the same path as the "junk DNA" argument. To Darwinists the broken gene or psuedogene is just another piece of discarded DNA sequence that is now junk and serves no useful purpose while ID proponents still maintain that useful function will be...
  11. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    Except that you are not attempting to explain the existence of the bridge or how it came about. We know how it came about, it was intelligently designed. If someone were to make the claim that it came about by natural processes, that someone would need to explain how the iron ore for the girders...
  12. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    The line between micro and macro has already been drawn at 500 bits of information by the Discovery Institute which corresponds to a word essay of 107 characters or 250 DNA base pairs which is 83 and one third codons. This number is derived from the estimated age of the universe in seconds...
  13. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    It has everything to do with evolution. Evolutionists like to claim that there no link between the two in order to avoid the subject. But without abiogenesis there is no evolution and therefore they are intimately related. Evolution is built on the framework of all ready existing life forms but...
  14. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    To qualify this you need to define what you mean by evolution. There is the micro-evolution which just about everyone accepts and then there is the materialistic rocks to life evolution which fewer accept. Secularists have a habit adjusting the statistics to their advantage. Let's face it...
  15. C

    The origin of life: Cell membranes.

    I looked it up and you are correct.
Top