Recent content by Faithoverbelief

I can't argue against that. Unless I saw a backstory on his quote I really don't get it. Perhaps I'm just dense?

Do you think I represent Twitter?

I answered the question. I posted what the guy said. Twitter said it is a violation you say it's not. Well it's Twitter's platform so they get to decide. I could care less.

You absolutely have no understanding of free speech. The government is who we are protected against with free speech. Twitter CARM Facebook etc do NOT owe you free speech. The company you or relatives have worked for do NOT offer you free speech.

Remember when pride was a sin? And [Elliot] Page just had [his] breasts removed by a criminal physician.” Not sure what it means but Twitter didn't like it.

I didn't think you were. It was a blanket statement of what I think about the situation.

Twitter considers it an attack on transgender. It's their house. If someone was in your house would you allow them to say anything they want? Or would you have rules?

I didn't ignore it, it is simple marketing. You can decide for yourself if Twitter is liberal neutral or whatever. I'm not on Twitter but I don't want more government control. I want smaller less government.

No free speech is not free speech it simply does not apply in many places. Free speech is concerning the government.

The rules don't mention a bias?

I already posted it. You'll have to look through the thread. Twitter posted their rules.

They do. Look at their rules. I'm not sure they could make it any more clear?

Definitions change. The post is titled How do you view faith. I shared my view.

Same could be said of Carm. They are allowed to make rules for THEIR platform why do you want to force someone to your rules? If you don't like it don't join.

It is the same. Carm has rules. Twitter has rules. People can disagree with rules. You just don't like Twitter's rules. Learn to be open to many rules.