Recent content by Stephen

Already did that. A guy that claims AIG is generally representative of Xtians (whoever they are) thinks his sources is impeccable. That's hilarious. Saying there is "no good scientific reason to think" something is a far far cry from declaring that there aren't any. If you can't tell the...

Let's try this: 1) The OP proposed that the Laws of Logic are INDEPENDENT of the way the universe is arranged (P5 and P6) 2) I argued that the proposal was false. The laws of logic are DEPENDENT on the way the universe is arranged (Post 12, Post 24, Post 37, post 58). 3) You hilariously brought...

Your claim: "you can't have a married bachelor" The claim relies on the idea that a married person and a bachelor are a contradiction. The Law of Non-Contradiction states It is impossible for the same thing to belong and not to belong at the same time to the same thing and in the same respect...

The rule of logic you are relying on is the Law of Non contradiction which entails simultaneity and assumptions about the direction and flow of time. Why would you assume time would behave identically if God created a different universe? Did you actually read what I wrote in the first post of...

The state of Bachelor/Married changes with time and time as a linear function as this universe is constituted. On what basis would you claim you can't have a married bachelor in a case where time behaves differently, for example if time doesn't behave as a well behaved function, or even as a...

I suppose you have to keep telling yourself that. I have no idea who these Xtians are. However you cite a US based protestant Christian websites and make a broad and sweeping claim about these Xtian characters. Let's actually evaluate the claim you are making: "Xtians generally believe...

I suppose in some other universe it is. I don't know about these Xtian characters, but Christians (and Jews) don't as a rule negate the existence of other universes, in fact many of them think the "new creation" might be another universe. What observations of other universes do you have that...

Let's see if I understand your logical contraption clearly: You posit that God can create a universe where the principal laws of logic are different from our own I have to explain how a proposition and its negation can both be true in that universe in order to have a point. Here's the...

The absurdity claim is false based on proposition 5. If God created a universe where a proposition and its negation were true at the same time, then such a situation wouldn't be absurd.

A link would be helpful to let people know what is entailed in the question. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/resource/55748/the-trinity-%E2%80%93-catechism-of-the-catholic-church

I would agree that Romans is missional and 9-11 is a single argument. And further, Paul is trying to convince the Romans ("greeks") to support his mission to the barbarians (i.e. Spain) (Romans 1:14, Romans 15:24-28). However I would place Romans 4-8 as Paul's central thesis. Paul's point to...

You aren't wrong, Trinitarians just need to be reminded of their doctrines now and then.

According to the doctrine of Anhypostasis. The son is a divine person and is NOT a human person.

I see. Even though the verse explicitly identifies God as somebody other than Jesus Christ, your imagination of what the phrase "author of life" overrides Peter's explicate declaration that Jesus is somebody other than God.

Let's read the verse: 15 You killed the author of life, but God raised him from the dead. We are witnesses of this. Jesus and God are identified as separate persons. A direct contradiction to the doctrine of the trinity and a direct affirmation of Unitarianism. Did you even read the verse?