Recent content by Towerwatchman

It caught my interest, so I purchased “The Scriptures”, Institute for Scripture Research, 2009 Edition, Republic of South Africa. Allow me to quote from this publication. Introduction page 17 “The Tanak in this translation is based on the Masoretic Hebrew and Aramaic text of the Scriptures...

Have the Bible translation you quoted from. It has a good amount of information about your sources. Not finished cross referencing, I should post on it tonight. As for the above, I should respond tonight also.

I believe the text reads Lord. I have your material in the mail awaiting review. From the text you can prove that they walked on two legs. Everything else is inferred from the text. What in chapter 18 states it’s three men or three angels?

Nothing in the text suggests that. When it’s angels the scriptures state so. Nothing here states that it is three angels.

Even if they were sent by YHWH, according to you and me YHWH does not share His glory. Then who is it? Cannot be angels. And if sent by YHWH where does it state that the three were sent by YHWH ?

What you keep missing is that there are different types of glory. One’s that can and cannot be shared. Isa speaks of what cannot be shared, John does. They are not the same. But enough with your latest red herring, and back to the main topic. if there are 3 YHWH in Gen 18:3 you have a...

Save the fathead comments. It’s your job to present complete arguments (chapter and verse) it’s not mine to either guess or do your homework, so I suggest you don’t gloat in your incompetence. Isaiah 42:8 I am the LORD, that is My name; (YHWH= expresses essence, existence...

Stay focused , John 17 what?

YHWH does not share his glory. If it is YHWH it cannot be angels

Yea we should take your word for it.

I am ordering the translation. If it is YHWH, you have found YHWH in plural form, and it can only apply to the Trinity. The most I ever found was two YHWH in one verses, you might have three. Thanks to inbound 68 for insisting I continue with the discussion.

Amazing how pitiful your existence must be, to keep track of mine.

I am appealing to all translators. From your silence on the matter of any translation that has YHWH in vs three, no one has translated using YHWH in the verse including the ones that must have read your resources. Your argument is dead in the water, and you are beating a dead horse.

It’s simple. Provide manuscripts or translations that contain YHWH in Gen. 18:3. Otherwise you have no credibility.

No, you have two opinions which the experts or authorities on the subject of translation did not consider when they translated. Accept it. You have been exposed.