Recent content by Whatsisface

Here is a Wiki page about a cross being used for Jesus' crucifiction. I take it it's unreliable? Found here.

You asked me what else you should call the video. I can believe that, considering the videos dishonesty. YECs, and a few other individual honorable mentions. Then that's a dumb quote. No it isn't. Truth is truth.

"Here's what I blindly believe some stranger on you tube say famous atheists said on their deathbeds". Did you watch the video? If you did, did you not question it? If you didn't, please be aware that a certain part of Christianity has no qualms about being dishonest about these matters. No...

Here's how you presented it ... "Famous atheists last words". You gave no qualification. You obviously did no research into what the video was saying and blindly accepted what it was saying. From what you say above you don't seem to care whether what it's saying is the truth or not.

Do you think that Hume cried out as the video said? If so do you know the quote's source?

The reason I replied to you was because the video was biased towards implying deathbed conversions and in Humes case that there is an afterlife. About Hume it says "He cried out loud on his deathbed, he cried, "I am in flames", it is said his desperation was a horrible scene" Here is a letter...

You tube has no checks and balances like Wiki, so taking that into account, do you trust some random poster on YouTube as a reliable source?

Do you trust some random poster on YouTube as a reliable source?

But you dismissed it out of hand.

Better than lying. So we can trust Wiki then? But it is true. And honesty feels good.

Yes, Someone on Wiki said that Jesus is thought of as the Son of God. Not as much as some if you Christians.

Yes, of being wrong. In this case, it looks like someone on Youtube said ...

I would be carefull of supposed last word quotes. This is from the Wiki page on Voltaire, the second subject in the video .... Found here.

This is an empty claim, as you've given no justification. That you don't understand this basic point of logic is baffling. It makes me wonder what else you've got wrong.

Maybe you should try thinking. That there is a universe that you think is evidence for a God, doesn't mean it is evidence for God. There is only real evidence for God if God exists, which pointing at the universe doesn't confirm. The most you have by pointing at the universe is might be, maybe.