Search results

I hear sweeping 🧹🧹🧹👂

It's ironic then, that Simonides was actually the only person in this whole self-propelled egocentric drama who was actually (and I mean, in reality) psychotic. The reason why he ended up on Mt Athos was because he tried to murder his step-parents.

Three absolutely fake Hermas texts alongside (another fake) the (stolen leaves, I might add) used for the Uranius palimpsest history text, all trying to be passed off as genuine in Memnon: Doesn't set off any red flags? 🚩 Doesn't set off any alarms for you? 🚨 Doesn't make you suspicious 🤔 in...

Your confused... it's amusing... and humorous... 😉

My opinion is, this is a non-issue.

Nope. Learned about it through my own research. You just posted a link to it on Google. Nope. My opinion, simply stated.

Simonides clearly said: Note the date and the words: "In 1852" "I...found it much altered" "Having an older appearance than it ought to have" Effectively Steven Avery is claiming that the words "much altered" and "older appearance" are not talking about either: Lemon "staining" or...

You mean the claims of (your words) "staining" were retrospectively made up later, like your presently doing. 😉

Ohhhhhhhhh I get it... your ✌️new✌️ information is the Memnon lies... You saw my translation of "this copy was discovered in the monastery on Mt Sinai in 1852" and...it was a revelation... even though no one (I mean absolutely no one qualified) took Mr Sinaiticus Facsimile Tracer-man's...

A weak (dead) non-issue that's simply not worth wasting anymore of your time on Mr Avery. Wake up and smell the coffee ☕.

I noticed that too when I was reading it.

Nothing you write or say can be trusted, like Simonides. Your yes doesn't mean yes, and your No does not mean no.

If it's written by Mr Tracer of the Sinaiticus fascimilies, it can't be trusted. Mr I'll copy Babingtons Hyperides for my NT Mayerianius forgeries is one of the most prolific liar's in all human history. Mr gimme gimme 10,000 to demonstrate I've practiced copying the Sinaiticus fascimilies...

Working on my own timeline details. Will probably take months to complete. Got quite a bit done already. Today, I'm quietly (in between other activities) working on the event's of 1855-1856 in Leipzig, leading up to Simonides arrest and imprisonment.

Off topic. Read the first post of this thread. This is a time-line thread. This is not a generic free for all, say anything you want about Simonides and the Sinaiticus thread. I will report this. Post on topic, no problem. Off topic = report. Simple.

If he had done real research, he'd discover he is wrong. There definitely were manuscript and book catalogues of sorts (see what the Kallinikos of Sinai said about ancient "catalogues" plural). It's documented/written in the St Catherine's manuscripts as well. And there exists a manuscript...

"Codex Friderico-Augustanus, sive, Fragmenta Veteris Testamenti : e codice graeco omnium qui in Europa supersunt facile antiquissimo in Oriente detexit, in patriam attulit, ad modum Codicis Edidit.” Sumtibus Caroli Francisci Koehleri, E Lithographeo J. J. Uckermanni Lipsiae, 1846 I think this...

"Codex Friderico-Augustanus, sive, Fragmenta Veteris Testamenti : e codice graeco omnium qui in Europa supersunt facile antiquissimo in Oriente detexit, in patriam attulit, ad modum Codicis Edidit.” Sumtibus Caroli Francisci Koehleri, E Lithographeo J. J. Uckermanni Lipsiae, 1846 I think this...

Typo correction for page numbers above: Page 203, Paragraph 2 Not page 2003. Also, add "is" in "The same conclusion drawn, more recently" to read "The same conclusion is drawn, more recently." Sorry, this is what happens when I post at ridiculous times of the morning, after an interrupted...

Note also the comment: Plymouth Jan 15.1863 "and I quite believe that in some of the forgeries of Simonides, he tried to imitate the writing thus engraved: but it was like his imitation of Mr. Babington's editions of the Papyri of Hyperides clumsily managed: it was a continued attempt to...