Search results

Like it or not you and him are co conspirators that share the false witness that Codex Sinaiticus was not an early Christian Bible but a gross forgery. No expert believes you whatsoever. You are not smarter than everyone else. You are not smarter than the whole of Christianity. You have been...

That would be the Byzantine Text. You know, 85-95% of all manuscripts. Why? Did all those Byzantine revisors revise the Old Covenant/Apocrapha of Sinaiticus with a non-Byzantine Text?

Just to be clear Burgon was all for revising the Textus Receptus and the King James Version knowing first hand they had errors needing to be fixed. But he disagreed with Hort's methods and explained why. He is no real friend of KJVOnly.

As well as the absurdity of the KJVOnlyist non-truth telling about the Textus Receptus and King James Version. Burgon would and does reject everything about your position of Sinaiticus and the KJV. Why? Because he was a scholar and learned man. He handled manuscripts himself. You do not. He...

He is your leader because he had nothing to do with the making of Codex Sinaiticus. He lied to slander Tishendorf and you follow him in his lies. Not one scholar agrees with you. No one normal does. No learned person does. Only those that do not want the truth do.

Simonides was a fraud. A forger of documents and a thief, liar and slanderer. Yet a leader among a few King James Onlyist.

Nope. No one could have made up that Text. It's Text goes back to the 1st, 2nd, probably 3rd centuries and definitely 4th century. https://www.skypoint.com/members/waltzmn/ManuscriptsUncials.html#uAleph Throughout history later scribes corrected its text towards the Byzantine Text. Multiple...

It only makes sense in an ancient scriptoreum. No one could make up that Text. Nothing else like it on this planet now exists. Certainly in the 2nd/3rd/4th century their was its exemplar. Your made up fantasy denial is just more of your rejection of the word of God.

The worst scribe in existence. Missed miles of text. Many other scribes throughout history corrected this text again and again. KJV ONLYIST don't account for such things though. No one could have made up such a uniquely ancient text as Codex Sinaiticus. It is impossible for someone to make up...

The only chance of redemption that he has is if he acknowledges Codex Sinaiticus is an ancient Christian Bible. He has seen tons of evidence that it is, and that Simionides is a fraud.

And even less important because textual critics realize most important textual varients came into existence in the 2nd century.

If daniels was accurate, he would have to say God hid the TR for 1500 years, since the first unique edition of it wasn't truly in existence until early 1500's.

5th century to 16th century. An outstanding statistic. And remember, when Vaticanus and Sinaiticus disagree, one or the other will usually go with the Byzantine Text.

That is very true. If he knew the texts he would not say crazy impossible things.

Proving that Avery is nothing but a gasslighter.

I am pretty sure you know of older manuscripts that read different. And how far do the 9th century manuscripts go back to? Don't all manuscripts go back to the first century AD? That's a lot of manuscripts almost all with independent histories going back in time. The other reading died out...

There is an huge amount of manuscripts that say otherwise.

He is being very reasonable. You are making fun of his logical explanations like some immature kid. Maturity is called for. Even if you disagree.

Perhaps it is you, and not Tischendorf that has a vain-glorious mentality.