Search results

To my dear father, John Luther, citizen in the valley of Mansfeld: grace and peace to you in Christ Jesus, our Lord and Saviour. Amen. Dear Father, My brother James has written me that you are seriously ill. As the weather is bad and the season dangerous, I am very anxious about you, for...

Sounds like another Early Church Lutheran

Yes, I would even say liturgy is fundamental to Lutheranism.

For plenty of your priests probably not, since Rome can't even assure us they are even Catholic and thus have thr magic power to make Christ go into the eucharist.

Yes.

Cardinal Ribiba. 95 percent of RC bishops come from him today. Everyone before that, you'll just have to trust the man behind the curtain.

No thanks. Yes all believers are the priesthood and all can bless the eucharist, though not all should.

Yup. Catholics can't even assure you that their priests are even Catholic in the first place, much less everyone of them going back 2 thousand years. https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2020/08/24/detroit-priest-invalid-baptism-canonical-consequences

So SSPX priests are legitimate and their mass is valid.

You don't get to invent new priesthoods when convenient.

That's irrelevant to whether or not they have a valid but illicit mass.

All believers are priests. Those called and ordained should be the ones serving communion, for good order.

So it's perfectly licit to attend an SSPX church? That's not what the RC currently teaches.

There's a strong human drive to want to work for ones salvation.

Is Jesus Chris present in the SSPX eucharist?

Rome acknowledges that there is such a thing as a valid but illicit mass. Example the SSPX.

Of course, even Rome acknowledged this.

Yes, if you are intending to do the eucharist. Though you would certainly being receiving it illicitly and to your own judgement.

Yes it does. Pastors don't have magic powers that only they can bless communion.

Sure if they intended to.