Search results

  1. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - Evolutionary Genetics, "natural selection is the only evolutionary force which can produce adaptation, ..., or conserve genetic states over very long periods of time in the face of the dispersive forces of mutation and drift". Your argument sounds like some...
  2. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    That is a problem that you have to answer since according to your theory, we all came from a common ancestor. The theory of Intelligent Design does not have the same obstacles as Darwinism and accepts evolution up to a point such not ascribing unlimited creative resources to NSRM in its ability...
  3. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    So according to you the Covid resistance mutation happened to millions of people around the planet in one year and even one month, in some cases, and that they have had time to pass it to their children. Sounds silly in those terms doesn't it (rhetorical question no question mark required). But...
  4. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    Then you have no problem with the fact that through all the mutations that have been directed at fruit flies, the result has always been, a normal fruit fly, a disabled fruit fly or a dead fruit fly. Mutations are a deleterious force and beneficial mutations are few and far between. And your...
  5. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    You are arguing against a straw man. To my knowledge no one has ever said that there are no mutations and ABO blood group is just some fabrication in your straw man that you feel addresses the issues to which you seem unclear.
  6. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    That's quite a feat for a mindless process. Your claim is that all these non-beneficial mutations are gathered together and coordinated to perform a function that didn't previously exist and with the foresight for some future function and at the extreme of functionality even putting an start and...
  7. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    I am not claiming that beneficial mutations do not occur but rather that they are not coordinated and are single point mutations and can't account for the multiple traits that require strings of base pairs with each base pair giving no benefit until the string is complete. What you inherited...
  8. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    Yes, the that trait is in the genes and selective breeding is the mechanism. If new genes were created in this process, it would be a complete validation of evolution. There would no need for the smoking gun evidence currently on display. You wouldn't need the hype that was created shortly after...
  9. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    First of all, Dembski was not pro-Darwin and then you tried to interject some form of pre-existing specification into his text which didn't exist. I asked for a source not your interpretation of the source. Who said anything about life, the subject was stochastic processes. Only very few were...
  10. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    What is the biblical hypothesis? I was assuming it was biblical scripture in general.
  11. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    No, and that is not its purpose.
  12. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    Not speaking as an ID associate, ID would explain differentiation by emphasizing parts of DNA over another. As for example, woollier sheep are produced through artificial selection by breeding woollier sheep with other woollier sheep. There are no new genes produced in the process. In the same...
  13. C

    Creationism is nonsense

    You have just eliminated all the branches in the nested hierarchy. If you were at the Alamo we'd all be wearing sombreros.
  14. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    A simple negation argument, very interesting. I think I'll try it - not.
  15. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    It appears that you don't understand Dr. Dembski's point and have adjusted it to fit your own. Interesting numbers. Do you have a source for "Evolution has been verified to 12) or did you just make that up. And GT verified to only 8 decimals is that GRT gravity or the Newtonian method. The...
  16. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    So you saying you are using your senses indirectly by reading it from a text book or article. Got it. What is this here for? So you can cut and paste, so what? It does suffice to me. And it suffices to every other scientific discipline with the exception of evolution with their theory that has...
  17. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    Your senses aren't telling you that because you're simple regurgitating what you've been taught. You learned evolution by hearing it or reading about it from somebody else. All you've demonstrated is a misunderstanding of Dr. Dembski. CSI, is the objective ID method as well as specified...
  18. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    That's because you deny what your own senses tell you. First, functional specified information only has one source and that is intelligence. We experience it everyday and the reason why secularists became livid over the ENCODE results that resulted in their posturing. And second, natural...
  19. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    Case in point. The higher Darwinist hierarchy hold the keys and determine who gets in or out and throw rocks at anyone or anything that challenges their pet theory of evolution. ID is correct and evolution in its materialistic form is false. That's at least two levels. Avida and genetic...
  20. C

    Nature did it is nonsense

    Mixing Creation Science in with ID is the Darwinist's attempt at discrediting the scientific theory of ID, just as they call all ID proponents YECs whether they accept a young earth or not. ID is a real scientific theory whether you chose to believe it or not and on a higher level than...
Top