Search results

HUH???? You said it was in context with the Urim and Thummim

I never knew there was any text around the facsimiles. Open your BoA and is there any text around the facsimiles? That's a new one on me. Do you know what a facsimile is, in regard to the BoA? Now if you are talking about fragment 1, for facsimile 1....we know with no doubt that the glyphs...

lol what post number would that be...I did a search on this thread and I never once typed or asserted plural marriage. Fo

LOL the wrong scripture you said was 130, and you said you meant 131....LOL so is it a oops also for 131..... Now focus....we are discussing the stone in the hat and you claimed D&C 130 was in that regards, then 131....yet neither do. So can we agree you have now idea what you are talking about?

Please elaborate what you are trying to assert from these six points? Start with # 1 and tell me what you think that means and how it answers my question, which you ducked, how do you know what was written on the missing scroll or more likely fragments? Here is point #1 by FAIR...what do you...

LOL common sense? Please elaborate how that works. What do you think these scrolls would say (read)???? Folks this will be a good one. because with both know that there are nt really any witnesses to what you claim.....and you are embarrassed to do so knowing they can't stand. But again...

How does 131 compliment there being no stone in his hat?

What thread? I appears you are unable to discuss with is fine, just say so.

So what article of faith (Creed) of the Historic Christian Faith, is an abomination, where do you want to start?

You said I wrote this, I did not, I assume you screwed up, which is okay, but to clarify these are your words not mine. Documentation for what....but also make sure you do your homework, it gets old bottle feeding you. I will when I have time, but you need to slow down and educate yourself...

So, what does that mean? How do you know that the fragments we have are not the ones he showed, or among them? Your argument is that there was a long and missing scroll that the current BoA was translated from. CFR? I am asking you to back that up. The missing scroll, or most likely...

LOL so if there are no claims, why have your argued that that there are?

So you disagree with Fair LDS that Joseph used a seer stone in his hat to translate the BoM... do you believe that you must enter into polygamy to be exalted, if not your are progressive. Do you believe LGBT folks should hold calling and be baptized as members, if yes, you are progressive. I can...

As are you, you back Fair which teaches a rock in the hat? What about BH roberts? And why did BY owe the church 1,000,000.00 plus dollars?

The 25L in cash is over 500k in todays money...focus.

Okay, and how does that keep BY from borrowing funds from the church....which BTW is the topic. How did BY become the wealthiest man in the west?

He is the LDS historian.....are you saying what he said is not true...why did BY die sowing the church a million dollars? Is BH- Roberts also lying like Arrington IYO?????

They didn't and this is about taxes Ralf, not about loans to prophets.

LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL.... Ralf did you read this? I highlighted something you might what note... This was about manipulating tax laws.

Well what you wrote read the church received over 25K in cash. Worth over a half of million dollars in those days. Ralf what you pasted here supports that there was ample funds available for a loan. Why you are ignoring the history that LDS prophets then and now, received no interest loans...