Search results

I'm not talking about you or I. I'm talking about Muslims. Do Muslims believe Muhammad is a prophet of God? Yes or no? Is he? Yes or no?

Do Muslims believe Muhammad is a prophet of God? Yes or no? Is he? Yes or no?

Your neighbor's kid is a dog or animal of some kind?

Good night, Gracie.

What's his/her name?

One. And I'll reciprocate.

Sure... and I'll name names of Christians that are even dumber than you. Sounds fair.

Now that's funny. Go ahead and connect the scientific theories that exist that support what we find in Genesis. This will be good. Don't leave out how snakes talk, and the scientific theory of fruit that impart knowledge, and how darkness is split from light without a source of light, and how...

It did bolster your point... until you employed the term credible. That leaves the Bible narratives out.

??? There are plenty of examples of people with an extra toe. Don't see any resurrected folk though.. so on a scale of stupid, this one tips it hard.

I don't profess evolution is true. Even if I did, and was wrong, it still does not follow that the ancient Jew's theory of mythological creation becomes the default theory

So she, and you, profess. I leave that to the mystery too. Never happened to me. I'll admit Jesus was a strong cultural and peer instigated suggestion that I took on, so much so that if they said he was green and had an extra toe I would have adopted that as well.

Not true... I love Iris. My wife's and my marriage theme song is her and John Prine's duet In Spite of Ourselves. (Skip to 1:40) But.... your post violated her premise by assuming Jesus is someone to meet. Given that many, many professed Christians claim that this personal knowing is...

How does it follow that if you can't evolve "kinds" then the ancient Jews theory of mythological creation becomes the default theory? The American Indian mythology of creation, and many others, would be just as credible as the Biblical narrative at that point.

No. Intrinsic characteristics of the elements would either bond or reject other elements. What forms via that bonding or rejecting isn't random at all. That's like saying random chance separates oil from water every time.

You are lying again. You are aware of the contentious element in your idea because you are leaving it out now as we are watching you closely here. You have extracted out the language where a believing mind causes reality to occur. Not occur to oneself, but just occur.

What?

If I'm on the leprechaun licensing committee they can. Like you are on the God licensing committee. Look at all the ridiculous stuff you give him license for.

Who is in charge of coming up with the limitations of leprechauns? Not just atheists i would assume.

Because it's better when you finally figure it out like you did above.