Search results

Agreed..the good book clearly shows our Lord's mission was first to the Jews...but many gentiles were also caught up in his ministry and his blessings..and even salvation of one's soul. I forget the reference but Christ even instructed to avoid certain gentile areas...until later. ( Keep in...

No, I meant what I stated.... it was in reference to your comment " Jesus said during His ministry as aimed at them specifically, but I don't", unless you are actually trying to say that Jesus's ministry was really aimed at the gentiles...... 's ok though. Yeah... so it looks like you agree...

I too personally don't see the evidence that 'everything Jesus said during his....' was aimed at only gentiles....as he did save many Jews before he died. I get your point about you seeing a difference in Covenant teaching (if I am reading you correctly) but Christ Himself did not always...

Yes...that all seems/appears to be reasonable and logical. Just as it is reasonable that many Jews were converted prior to the 3000 as well since Christ's first ministry was to the Jews. I would fully agree that most of the Jewish faith would of had (and still do) hold insights to events and...

But did not scripture state on several occasions that the Jews rejected Jesus our Christ? ...and don't we all pretty much agree on the scripture that teaches about those that reject Christ are also rejected by Christ? I think that was the point being made above... along with a remnant of Jews...

Let's expose how badly the Pixie misses the mark... and how dishonest she really is. ( a real PhD would likely have avoided such inconsistencies) Too funny that the Pix claims to be a Phd yet does not understand the scientific field of mathematics. The pixie attempts to make things up again and...

So so important to re-iterate the flawed OP: The Pixie opened up this heavily flawed Thread with : "What is the eventual outcome of SETI? Either they discover a signal or they give up looking. The former will be world shattering news, but will it be science? I do not think so, because neither...

You bet (I have met some really quirky bio-chemists too), but nonetheless, mathematics is broadly considered a scientific field. Agreed - but so far, they have had no real issues quantitating their results as they compare them to their hypothesis ...and then determine it they support the...

Let's expose how badly the Pixie misses the mark... and how dishonest she really is. ( a real PhD would likely have avoided such inconsistencies) Too funny that the Pix claims to be a Phd yet does not understand the scientific field of mathematics. The pixie attempts to make things up again...

The Pixie is just another faker... most likely not even a Phd as she claims .. since most of her constructs lack actual educated points. Pix is certainly allowed room for an opinion about SETI but since Pixie can't support that claim then we are just pointing that out - Even the link Pix...

Not sure that your point is the correct one...since, if we all go by that thinking then why would mathematicians keep looking for the next Prime number and any correlation to all primes? Just because the true science used by the true SETI scientists are not finding any real results yet does...

So so important to re-iterate the flawed OP: The Pixie opened up this heavily flawed Thread with : "What is the eventual outcome of SETI? Either they discover a signal or they give up looking. The former will be world shattering news, but will it be science? I do not think so, because neither...

LOL you seem to miss a lot of key points when reading. I gather your 'self-proclaimed' PhD did not come in Lit or English. I love your your responses have nothing to do with what was typed in... for example your making things up again How ignorant some can get can anyone believe PIX...

Agreed.... while fascinating ... AI.... is just another scientific endeavor. Some intellectuals truly believe that AI will indeed prove itself as 'human/ moral / mindful' as us... but in no way can that ever be realized since a machine has no soul...has no mind... and has no morals. LIke you...

Again... ID has nothing to do with the Designer. so your 'Point B' above is not valid. ID makes ZERO assertions about the designer. ID has already covered the simple and naturally occurring complex designs like snow flake crystals and such ( it is a repeatable naturally occurring 'thing'...

Good example and good understanding of ID. Unfortunately there are those that purposely refuse to admit to the basics of ID. Doing so causes them world-view distortions that they don't want to deal with. there are a few minor tweaks I need to make to your comments: "Supernatural...

I very much agree.... and that is why most professional sites that deal with SETI discussions believe SETI is a valid scientific endeavor that uses the scientific method.

So so important to re-iterate the flawed OP: The Pixie opened up this heavily flawed Thread with : "What is the eventual outcome of SETI? Either they discover a signal or they give up looking. The former will be world shattering news, but will it be science? I do not think so, because neither...

LOL...you were just embarrassed again.... in your FLAWED OP you claimed: that SETI is an either/or thing.... specifically here is what Pixie actually stated in post 1: "What is the eventual outcome of SETI? Either they discover a signal or they give up looking. The former will be world...

The Pixie first claims that posting on CARM is not science..now the Pixie backtracks and wants to know why? Hmmmm seems like either the pixie forgot what they posted earlier of is just fishing for clarification on what constitutes science. So the Pixie appears not to be a scientist but for...