Search results

The three in verse 6 (the blood, the water, the Spirit) are the same three in verse 7 (i.e. blood, the water, the Spirit) and the same three (the blood, the water, the Spirit) in verse 8. The context flows naturally and conceptually through all three verses, from the three in verse 6 to the...

The context flows naturally and conceptually through all three verses, from the three in verse 6 to the same three in verse 7 and the same three in verse 8.

Plainly not true. The three in verse 6 are the same three in verse 7 and the same three in verse 8. It's so simple.

Possible freudian slip in this sentence.

Where does Geogrios Babiniotis state the reality of this "syntactic parallelism" in the Greek grammar and language books he's published (reference name of publication, page, paragraph, subheading etc)? By memory (which could be wrong) you are quoting a second hand email to Nick Sayers...

That's exactly what I suspect, that he's making this stuff up out of phrases and sentences from stuff he's Googled on the internet, which he's pieced together in a word processor to appear plausible to unwary and unsuspecting, rather than backing up his claims from a legitimate Greek NT grammar...

The basic's Avery and co try to blind people of and divert attention away from, is the true context of verse 6. 1 John 5:6 Οὗτός ἐστιν ὁ ἐλθὼν δι’ ὕδατος καὶ αἵματος Ἰησοῦς Χριστός. οὐκ ἐν τῷ ὕδατι μόνον ἀλλ’ ἐν τῷ ὕδατι καὶ ἐν τῷ αἵματι. καὶ τὸ Πνεῦμά ἐστιν τὸ μαρτυροῦν, ὅτι τὸ Πνεῦμά ἐστιν ἡ...

"Dr Lawrence Bednar" looks very much like he might be (note "might be" Spencer, but should actually be "might have been" now he's dead) another one of Avery's team. http://www.kjvtextualtechnology.com/illustrating-the-lack-of-scholarship-by-internet-c.php Who died of complications from Covid-19...

He never owns what he writes.

Who justifies this with what you describe as "invisible allegory", whom you also ditched, and now are trying to sneak back into the discussion as if you didn't.

Thanks for admitting you haven't discussed the true context. Verse 6.

No you expect people to say what you want them to say. And they don't. ;)

I talked about the true context. Meaning simply, that verse 6, is the true context of verses 7 and 8. I asked for verification of the truth of your vague concepts from a Grammar publication for your use of the term "whole" (page, name, paragraph, subheading etc). I also asked for...

Didn't say that. You made that up out of my post, like a lot things you twist and make up.

Thanks for admitting that I use correct grammatical terminology, whereas, you just make stuff up. 👍

Context is the blood, the water, and the (S/s)pirit in verse 6. That's the true context.😉 1 John 5:6 τὸ Πνεῦμά ἐστιν ἡ ἀλήθεια τὸ (= neuter) Πνεῦμά (= neuter) ἐστιν ἡ (= feminine) ἀλήθεια (= feminine).

Which/what NT grammar publication backs up your definition of this "unit" you speak of? Which/what NT grammar publication backs up your definition of this "whole" you speak about? List the name, page, author etc. This could be just something you and your buddies conjured/made up (for all we...

Always check my post's carefully for quote marks " " (such as that phrase - syntactic "unit" which you quoted, "unit" was the only word that had quote marks in that particular clause) and question marks, bolding and italics etc for emphasis. Pay careful attention to these. If you do, you'll get...

Bill you might want to look at this link. http://www.kjvtextualtechnology.com/illustrating-the-lack-of-scholarship-by-internet-c.php

Steven, to bring clarity to this discussion you need to define clearly the following terms you use in reference to the grammar of 1 John 5:7-8. Define exactly what constitutes the "whole" Define exactly what constitutes the "unit" Define exactly what constitutes the "syntactic parallelism"