Search results

KJVONLYism is a farce (among other things). There is no important Christian doctrine that is threatened or omitted by modern version. I not only challenge you - I flat out DEFY you to try to show that there is.

In asking JWs about their 1914 doctrine (a doctrine that MUST be believed in order for the possibility for salvation one day), I submit that the following deserves serious consideration: Originally the JW's taught that Jesus was enthroned as king of the kingdom of God in Oct. 1874, not Oct...

That is exactly what's being said, and you are correct.

Yes. It is very easy to understand: Since the KJV DOES NOT provide an English word for every original-language word of Scripture given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles in the originals, and since the KJV itself HAS omitted, added, changed, condensed, and optimized the wording...

Okay - So you have now stated that God not only inspired the original manuscripts but also (and ONLY) the KJV. Never mind the fact that the KJV does NOT provide an English word for every original-language word of Scripture given by inspiration of God to the prophets and apostles in the...

JDS - This isn't going away. You very much need to provide a clear, plain-spoken clarification here.

Four quotes to start with: “All who want to understand the Bible should appreciate that the "greatly diversified wisdom of God" can become known only through Jehovah's channel of communication, the faithful and discreet slave.” Watchtower 10/1/1994 p. 8 From JR: See the word “only”...

Years ago, author Dave Breese wrote a book called Marks Of A Cult and gave a listing of cult characteristics. The JWs have most of these characteristics. Here is a site that gives a good description of the characteristics: http://christiandestiny.org/publications/book/1981-cult-marks?00

(shrug) And you would be very, very wrong.

"If you think that "not one Christian belief/doctrine has been omitted or threatened by MVs", then you are living in cloud cuckoo land. What about the doctrine that the preaching of the gospel is supposed to be confirmed by signs following?" Thank you for being so openly insulting. It was not...

If they're so corrupted then answer me this: I have claimed multiple times that there is not one Christian belief/doctrine that has been omitted or threatened by MVs. I have challenged you and other KJVONLYists to prove me wrong, right here, for all to see. You have never done so. Not...

Leatherneck, your post is both preposterous and downright silly in what it asserts. In other words, "the usual". The idea that those with the KJV worship God, and the implied accusation that those who use MV's do not proves that. If anyone has set up an idol, it is those in the KJVONLY movement.

Jesus openly, clearly, and directly declared that seeing Him equals seeing God Himself. Here is John 14:8-9: 8 Philip said to him: “Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us.” 9 Jesus said to him: “Even after I have been with you men for such a long time, Philip, have you...

LOL! I'm not the one who intentionally and deliberately perverted the Micah verse - That's all on you. Anyone who can read with even a modicum of comprehension can very, very easily see that your posting has not dealt honestly or truthfully with what Jamesh posted. And I predict that the cow...

LOL! The recorded posting history of the other thread is that what happened again and again and again and again is that the inability of your posts to accurately and truthfully talk about verses was truly...."remarkable". And it still is. You're doing the very same thing here with what...

LOL! The record of Scripture is that He had the name "Jesus" before He was even conceived. That you deny, lie about, and run away from this - That's what your posts DO. By the way - Go back to what Jamesh said regarding Micah 5:2: "His goings forth are from long ago, From the days of...

LOL! The above is pure, blatant falsehood. In other words, "the usual" for your posts.

You're wrong, Nathan. He had the name "Jesus" before He was born - before He was even conceived. This was proven in the other thread, "Did Jesus Create The Angels?", and the only thing your posts ever did is deny it, lie about it, and run from it. I do not wish to detract from what Jamesh...

JDS - I ask you again - Please provide clarification for this: REPEAT OF POST (#141): logos 1560 wrote: It is a fact that the KJV does not provide an English word for every original-language word of Scripture given by inspiration to the prophets and apostles so that all His words are not...

JDS - Please provide clarification for this: REPEAT OF POST (#141): logos 1560 wrote: It is a fact that the KJV does not provide an English word for every original-language word of Scripture given by inspiration to the prophets and apostles so that all His words are not preserved in the KJV...