Search results

Perhaps they are not as wacky as your human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning.

Perhaps you describe many of your own posts.

Thanks for asserting that your simple, non-scholarly comments should not be accepted.

Are you claiming that God did not preserve His words in the existing preserved original-language manuscript copies of Scripture? Wilbur N. Pickering wrote: "The AV (KJV) has a most unfortunate translation of both Matthew 21:5 and Zechariah 9:9 (that has been corrected in the NKJV fortunately)"...

Several pre-1611 English Bibles and many post-1611 English Bibles clearly, precisely, and accurately identify Jesus Christ as "our God and Saviour" at 2 Peter 1:1. William Tyndale in 1534, Miles Coverdale in 1535, and John Rogers in 1537 translated the last part of this verse as "righteousness...

Do KJV-only advocates apply their common slogan or statement "things that are different are not the same" consistently and justly? Mickey Carter asserted: “Things that are different are not the same. Bibles that are different are not the same” (Things That Are Different, p. 77). John C...

The KJV is not the only English Bible translation that clearly teaches that Jesus Christ is God Almighty so this thread does nothing to prove any non-scriptural, exclusive only claims for the KJV.

At Joshua 5:3, the KJV has: And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins. At Joshua 5:3, the 1560 Geneva Bible has: Then Joshua made him sharp knives & circumcised the sons of Israel in the hill of the foreskins. Does the KJV suggest...

Your misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and misrepresentations do not demonstrate your unproven claim to be true. Perhaps you bear false witness in disobedience to a clear command of God.

Your human non-scriptural KJV-only opinions seem to reject the greater authority of the existing preserved Scriptures in the original languages. Perhaps you are uninformed or misinformed concerning the majority of Greek NT manuscripts. Wilbur Pickering noted that those “who has collated any...

You fail to correct your false accusations. Your own fellow KJV-only poster Steven Avery, who defends 1 John 5:7 being in the KJV, contradicts you since he suggests or claims that 1 John 5:7 does not teach the Trinity or triune God. As I understand his unclear "oneness" view, Steven Avery...

The textually-varying printed Textus Receptus Greek NT editions have as many as 1,000 readings that are found in a minority of the collated Greek NT manuscripts and even some readings found in no known Greek NT manuscripts. Wilbur Pickering noted that those “who has collated any number of MS...

Your lack of sound understanding and lack of sound interpretation may be bizarre. You refuse to learn as you cling to your incorrect opinions. It is the term Scripture that suggests written, not the term "God-breathed." The term Scripture would refer to words of God that are written, but...

So what? Believers today have the same preserved Greek New Testament available to the makers of the KJV. Do you reject the KJV's underlying Greek New Testament text?

If you do not know what "God breathed" means, then you do not know what "given by inspiration of God" means. Is the use of an English noun inspiration as part of the rendering for an adjective in Greek providing a form-equivalent rendering [adjective for an adjective]? In the preface of Kirk...

Is your modern KJV-only version of the gospel that no one believed and taught before 1611 "another everlasting gospel"? Do you continue to throw out wild or bizarre accusations based on your misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and misrepresentations that you fail to prove to be true? Are...

The poster did not actually deny the deity of Christ so you seem to bear false witness against him. That poster also did not deny the Trinity. Your misunderstandings and misinterpretations may be bizarre. Steven Avery, a KJV-only advocate who sometimes posts here, defends 1 John 5:7 being in...

Your posts have demonstrated that you have deceived you yourself to believe claims that are not true and that are not scriptural. You fail to prove your accusations to be true. You possibly may believe your non-true claims, but that does not prove them to be true. You keep dismissing and...

If that is what you truly want, you yourself would declare and share the gospel of Christ. Instead, your very own posts suggest that you make your request as a diversion away from the truth that exposes and refutes some of your claims as being not true.

Your human, non-scriptural, inconsistent, illogical, modern KJV-only theory makes no sense. My view of Bible translations is consistently and soundly based on what the Scriptures state and teach. You condemn and reject scriptural truths being applied consistently and justly.