Search results

What activity of God ?Oh that would be The Consubstantial Logos/Son taking upon Himself this flesh, these bones, and this blood ,by way of the virgin. ......Alan

On the contrary, Yachristian your Christological science is as semi Arian as Gary Mac's,yahwillincrease, and any Oneness who erroneously suppose ," The Father is The Spirit ,and the son is the flesh. Oneness and Unitarians alike, half baked Christology'/Theologies , carries the very same" first...

And Yet Christ is not just a man, but also The Consubstantial Logos Himself made man . The Hypostasis of The Divine Wisdom. God The Word. And The Word was with God, and The Word was God, and The Word was made flesh, and made is dwelling among us, and we beheld His glory as of the only Begotten...

This man Jesus the Christ is God manifested in the flesh . And according to Scriptures alone, this is by way of The Consubstantial Logos/Word of God Himself fashioned in a virgin birth. For God so loved the world that He gave His only Begotten Son, made to the creature, to become obedient...

Yachristian your question literally presupposes, the Son is other than numerically One with The Father . And thus other lessor created being. Therefore not God . You might as well tell me," Jesus is just a man with the fully indwelling spirit representing God The Father". The Son's...

This man Jesus the Christ is God manifested in the flesh . And according to Scriptures alone, this is by way of The Consubstantial Logos/Word of God Himself fashioned in a virgin birth. I told you before ," Nothing can be The Form/Morph of God, but God". Therefore 4th century Latin Augustine...

Gary Mac , I need you to listen to me very carefully . God by His very Nature is Spirit ,and being Spirit does not make God any less a Rational Intelligent Self Existing Substance/Thing. Infinite Intelligent Supreme Substance/Deity to be exact. Now You asserted God is Spirit . He is also...

Genesis 1:1 refers to God without regard to any particular Relative Oppositio/Predication ,signified by this word Person. Secondly Word and Son express the Same. Thirdly God has never been without His Wisdom ,hence The Word is Ever Begotten/Conceived. Fourthly whensoever The Father is likewise...

What difference does that make ? None .....Alan

Why make this about me? The fact that I rightly understand what you call gibberish, means nothing to me, nor does it Negate your stating principle of Dividing The Substance. My job is not to impress with verbiage ,but rather as the men of old refute, the heretics against charges of polytheism...

Every Divine Person b On the contrary every Person by Himself is that Substance. One is The Father another is The Son and another is The Holy Spirit. So the Greeks say," Tres Hypostases Un Ousia", Hope that helps. .......Alan

On the contrary The name God The Father does not merely refer to Yahweh transcendent as spirit ,God declared while giving the Oracles to Moses on the Mount," I AM He Who is the Perfection of All being". The Spirit of God does not merely refer to Yahweh immanent as spirit., God declared while...

I'm sorry but that is how modern English renders a medevial Latin. But let me see if I can simplify. God is Infinite, so in ancient babble , that means obsolutely Indeterminate. Therefore In God what is Indeterminately signified by Plurality is signified by Trinity in a Determinate manner". If...

Is God Infinite enough not to require three hosts, you asked? I respect this question , rather than just asserting incoherent babble without actually refuting one word I stated. Secondly I wouldn't need to quote some scriptures ,which is why I mostly quote the so called Greco Roman Latin...

But you Divide The Substance as your starting principle, therefore it doesn't matter what you say or what you think. The Father and The Son are numerically One Undivided Supremely Being itself. God does not birth a creature, The Word Himself Ever proceed in Supreme DEITY. And there is not one...

Incoherent babble you say? Well Let me see if I can dumb down the ancient and medevial Greco Roman camel riding Latin doctors all the way down for our modern English speaking comprehension. Whatever you believe of the Logos Word. Whatever Yah Wil increase believe of the Logos/Word...

On the contrary we number so as not to Confound and Confuse the Subsistence= ie the manner inwhich The Divine Nature Subsist. You are taking Second Person in the most corporal and created sense ,which could not belong to God, wherefore God Logos/Word is in no way distinct therefrom really Divine...

We read the Bible as it is written which is why we worship God in Christ. You people see Jesus as a special man with God powers. Now that reads like fiction. For you semi Arians, Jesus is just a man with God powers, for us, Jesus is a particular man with God Person. ......Alan

Let me dumb it down for you Whatever you anti Trinitarians think the Logos is, from all Eternity, will be determined in the distinct Co Essential Person of the Son Emptied and realized in the days of His flesh. Unlike our word where thought follows after thought God Word has His own Hypostasis...

In the days of the Word of God's flesh obedience and servitude until death on the cross. Then He God up taking with Him His Divine Prerogative/with all power. . We hold two things to be true at once , so you Unitarians should know half of the stuff we agree. I don't know if you meant to refute...