Search results

Exactly, you think humans are better and greater than other animals and more important. But that is not an objective fact it is just opinion. If there is no God, then there is no difference between killing a human and eating them or killing a cow and eating it. It does matter but it does not...

Yes, sometimes the majority is wrong, sometimes they are right. Space travel.

Maybe I should have said Neo-Darwinism. If someone in most secular universities today said that the beginning of life was supernatural would be railroaded out of the university as crazy creationist. Yes, but not in major mainstream academia. You have to at least assume materialism or naturalism...

Genesis 6:5 and Romans 5:15-19. It was originally perfectly lined up with Gods moral character.

It was not good, it is never good for someone to die, but it was a just act under the old covenant when conducted by the proper authorities. Under the Old covenant the ancient hebrew theocracy was held to a higher standard as Gods representatives on earth. God did not want any sabbath breakers...

No, my interpretation is just as possible as yours. It is not refuted. Yes, there is evidence that the cause DOES have the properties of God. Scientists study the characteristics of the effect to determine the characteristics of the cause. For example, the universe has purposes in it, ie eyes...

See post 2098.

No, we know that "slicing' the micro-distance between two objects an infinite number of times is not an actual/real infinite distance because when we measure at the macro level, the distance is easily measurable and not infinite. So an infinite number of cause and effect events at the macro...

Ok show me a picture of the belief or thought that God does not exist. The mind would be interacting with the brain not a keyboard. I am still waiting for a picture of a mind or a slice of mind. Because I am a normal person, without God you dont even know what normal is. That is part of the...

I said His moral character exists outside of our minds. Can you name something that exists outside our minds that does not objectively exist? So you admit that your first statement was incorrect? Ie that there is no common morality among all humans. But in fact there is and it aligns with the...

I dont have a link to it, but I can provide the name of the book that quoted from it. Page 210 in "From Darwin to Hitler". Many historians agree with me. Award winning biographer of Hitler, Alan Bullock, says Hitler "detested Christian ethics in particular. Its teaching, he declared, was a...

Yes, but many times in the history of science the majority view has been wrong. But as I stated above there have been situations in the past where we didnt have much information at all about a situation and we didnt even know if logic would be valid but when we assumed that logic was valid...

Because otherwise your morality is just based on feelings, ie subjective. Also, as our creator God knows what is best for us. Some people, transgenders for example, think it is morally good to have certain body parts chopped off for no objective reason. So it is just your feelings versus his...

We do understand that the laws of physics breakdown at the BB, which implies something supernatural. There are many documented miracle claims in the present day as well. The cosmos contains personal beings (us), and we know that persons only come from the personal. Also, purposes exist in the...

What dont you understand? Having the abilty to understand the consequences of your actions doesnt make you moral. Even dogs can do that. Yes, people have views of harm and suffering that contradict each other. Transgenders consider it harmful to them if you dont use their preferred pronoun...

That is one possible interpretation, but it could also mean that the extreme conditions themselves point toward the supernatural so that natural laws breakdown. And there is other evidence that point in that direction. A cause cannot be part of the effect, ie the universe. The cause must be...

Because we rebelled against Him and that damaged our moral conscience, so that it no longer lines up consistently with His standard therefore we need Him to guide us and using His spirit to restore our conscience (though it takes time) and to help with that by providing it to us in written form.

Thats right. How did such beings come to be in this universe? When we know that such characteristics can only come from a pre-existing being with those characteristics? Only a personal being can produce persons.

On pages Pages 144-145 of the 1943 edition. Only by ignoring his conscience and Gods revealed Word.

My second sentence explains why. Actually among most societies there are certain things that almost all agree on. For example, it is almost always wrong to kill a member of your group, lie to a member of your group, steal from members of the group, and have sex with another person's spouse that...