Ámbar dies day after deadly clot shot The 3-year-old sudden cardiac arrest.

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
Also the EUA is dependent on the fiction of no effective treatments. Billons of dollars are at stake, so a portion of that is used to buy off the best journalists and politicians $ can buy.
Exactly. That’s why they demonize cheap, effective drugs that have been around for ages and proven safe.
 

John t

Super Member
I’m not confused and I don’t look to Wikipedia for any information.

WOW!! You really missed the point on that reply!

Please read it again.
Here is a part of an article from Wikipedia, and I chose that because it was not from Pfizer, J&J or Moderna, etc
The point was not to use Wiki as an authority (which I am loathe to do), but to cite them as a neutral third party; not a part of Big Pharma. So, before you take issue with what I posted and pass it off as "poisoned resource" you need to independently verify that that their information is correct. I did that because I first looked at the Moiderna web site.

I do not want to appear to be cruel to you, your friend, nor to her autism spectrum child, but one or even 100 cases among the millions of dosages given does not rise to the degree of probability/assurance that establishes causality. If it were the case, then there would be a recall of the vaccine similar to a defect in an auto or salmonella in certain lettuce from a certain place.

I’m not confused

Did you understand that there is a H U G E (but easily confused) difference between messenger RNA (mRNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)? For one thing, they are different, having distinct purposes. RNA is not the same thing as DNA.

Here it is again. Please do not "blow it off" until you understand it:

The "life cycle" of an mRNA in a eukaryotic cell. RNA is transcribed in the nucleus; after processing, it is transported to the cytoplasm and translated by the ribosome. Finally, the mRNA is degraded.​
In molecular biology, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is a single-stranded molecule of RNA that corresponds to the genetic sequence of a gene, and is read by a ribosome in the process of synthesizing a protein.​

Perhaps your friend can explain it better, but as I understand it, it is analogous to taking the directions from your car's GPS and downloading it into a self-driving auto such as Google Maps use. Obeying all the road rules, the self-driving car gets you from point A to point B.
 

Carol

Well-known member
Thanks for the compliment!

Because there is much confusion, and few facts, I wanted to post in an informational, non-adversarial manner. The wise will learn from it, but unfortunately, some will continue in their ignorance, nursing their uninformed, (possible paranoid) biases.

Insults are so "non-adversarial"....
 

Bonnie

Super Member
Was it honest to wear a mask for show? Was it honest for politicians to put mandates on people like masks and lockdowns and ignore them themselves?
These have nothing to do with the threads I have seen on here from GP and Epoch Times that were lies and posted on here, as if they were the truth.
 

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
WOW!! You really missed the point on that reply!

Please read it again.

The point was not to use Wiki as an authority (which I am loathe to do), but to cite them as a neutral third party; not a part of Big Pharma. So, before you take issue with what I posted and pass it off as "poisoned resource" you need to independently verify that that their information is correct. I did that because I first looked at the Moiderna web site.

I do not want to appear to be cruel to you, your friend, nor to her autism spectrum child, but one or even 100 cases among the millions of dosages given does not rise to the degree of probability/assurance that establishes causality. If it were the case, then there would be a recall of the vaccine similar to a defect in an auto or salmonella in certain lettuce from a certain place.



Did you understand that there is a H U G E (but easily confused) difference between messenger RNA (mRNA) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)? For one thing, they are different, having distinct purposes. RNA is not the same thing as DNA.

Here it is again. Please do not "blow it off" until you understand it:

The "life cycle" of an mRNA in a eukaryotic cell. RNA is transcribed in the nucleus; after processing, it is transported to the cytoplasm and translated by the ribosome. Finally, the mRNA is degraded.​
In molecular biology, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) is a single-stranded molecule of RNA that corresponds to the genetic sequence of a gene, and is read by a ribosome in the process of synthesizing a protein.​

Perhaps your friend can explain it better, but as I understand it, it is analogous to taking the directions from your car's GPS and downloading it into a self-driving auto such as Google Maps use. Obeying all the road rules, the self-driving car gets you from point A to point B.
I understand just fine John. I promise I’ve studied this more than you ever have, without looking to Wikipedia. You reposting it doesn’t change anything. That you think it is a “neutral third party” tells me all I need to know.
 

Furion

Well-known member
Because there is much confusion, and few facts, I wanted to post in an informational, non-adversarial manner. The wise will learn from it, but unfortunately, some will continue in their ignorance, nursing their uninformed, (possible paranoid) biases.

Wow
 

Yakuda

Well-known member
These have nothing to do with the threads I have seen on here from GP and Epoch Times that were lies and posted on here, as if they were the truth.
Anything that blows yo your argument has anything to do with the thread. Fascinating.
 

John t

Super Member
Insults are so "non-adversarial"....
You cannot find in this thread anywhere I insulted a poster. Therefore, there is no truth in your sarcastic repeating and essentially twisting of my words.

I am posting facts from cited sources. Those disagreeing with what I post are for the most part quoting singular (but tragic) events or wingnut web sites having little credibility.

Of course, everyone is entitled to have differing opinions, but when we are dealing with something as serious as Covid-19 and its variants, I believe that science-based, peer-reviewed material should prevail over mere opinion based upon singular events.

Nevertheless, as a Christian, I know that God is neither "surprised nor intimidated" by Covid 19. Those who trust Him should heed the promise and implied warning of 2 Chronicles 7:14

, 14 then if my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and will pray and will seek my face and will turn from their evil ways, then I myself shall hear from the heavens and will forgive their sins and heal their land.

It is serious, folks, but it is not a time to play "Chicken Little".
 

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
Can you be so kind as to post peer reviewed evidence for this nefarious scheme?

There are 52 studies on the cheap, effective drugs they lied about. Look it up if you want to know the truth....or better yet, read "The Real Anthony Fauci" by RFK....all the info you could ever want, with citations are in there.
 

4Him

Administrator
Staff member
You cannot find in this thread anywhere I insulted a poster. Therefore, there is no truth in your sarcastic repeating and essentially twisting of my words.

John t said:
Thanks for the compliment!

Because there is much confusion, and few facts, I wanted to post in an informational, non-adversarial manner. The wise will learn from it, but unfortunately, some will continue in their ignorance, nursing their uninformed, (possible paranoid) biases.


That's kind of an across the board insult of those that would disagree with you, which probably includes me. I'm neither ignorant, uninformed or paranoid.


I am posting facts from cited sources. Those disagreeing with what I post are for the most part quoting singular (but tragic) events or wingnut web sites having little credibility.

Of course, everyone is entitled to have differing opinions, but when we are dealing with something as serious as Covid-19 and its variants, I believe that science-based, peer-reviewed material should prevail over mere opinion based upon singular events.

You assume scientists can't be bought and studies can't be falsified.....100% of scientists agree with those funding them....and just look at the Lancet report of HCQ they had to retract because it was all a lie.....and just because you think a website is 'wingnut', how about you prove it is first.
 
Last edited:

Carol

Well-known member
You cannot find in this thread anywhere I insulted a poster. Therefore, there is no truth in your sarcastic repeating and essentially twisting of my words.

I am posting facts from cited sources. Those disagreeing with what I post are for the most part quoting singular (but tragic) events or wingnut web sites having little credibility.

Of course, everyone is entitled to have differing opinions, but when we are dealing with something as serious as Covid-19 and its variants, I believe that science-based, peer-reviewed material should prevail over mere opinion based upon singular events.

Nevertheless, as a Christian, I know that God is neither "surprised nor intimidated" by Covid 19. Those who trust Him should heed the promise and implied warning of 2 Chronicles 7:14

, 14 then if my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and will pray and will seek my face and will turn from their evil ways, then I myself shall hear from the heavens and will forgive their sins and heal their land.

It is serious, folks, but it is not a time to play "Chicken Little".

What does your so- called "science- based, peer- reviewed material" have to do with trusting God?
 

Son Of Saxon

Active member
The following vaccines are recommended by the CDC to be done by their 18th month birthday. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/easy-to-read/child-easyread.html

YOU CANNOT GET A CHILD INTO SCHOOL WITHOUT HAVING PROOF OF VACCINATION FOR THESE14 DISEASES

  1. Chicken Pox
  2. Diptheria
  3. Hib
  4. Hepatitis A
  5. Hepatitis B
  6. Influenza (Flu)
  7. Measles
  8. Mumps
  9. Pertussis (Whooping Cough)
  10. Polio
  11. Pneumococcal
  12. Rotavirus
  13. Rubella
  14. Rotavirus

Are there aby CREDIBLE anti-vaxers who are in favor of children being infected by these 14 diseases?
All of those Vaccines are not what's called Leaky vaccines notice the flu shot is not mandatory......the ones you list.... They all stop infection and transmission...none of them manipulate your Nucleus and ribosomes in Your cells. None of them were rushed out the door in a year, none of them entered "mandatory" phases ...Infact if you research your claims....they are actually optional if a parent gives reasons why they won't do it....even here in Ontario. edit

It also Varys between province and state ...for instance in Manitoba you only need two shots ..and you can decline and write a letter stating whyz and still have your child attend school.

Also the vaccine we are talking about doesn't stop infection, or spread....annnnnnd the vaccines you are talking about do....and do it for viruses that are life ending and debilitating. COVID has a 99%+ chance of survival and more so for kids.....

Try again
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Bonnie

Super Member
Can you be so kind as to post peer reviewed evidence for this nefarious scheme?
I can't do that, but I can show you that many of the studies on using ivermectin to treat civid had serious flaws in them:


For every study I read online that showed favorable results with ivermectin. I would find one where it gave no benefit, or the results were inconclusive.

There was the Together trial, where, if I remember right, ivermectin was found to be ineffective.

There is a large, randomized controlled study going on now in Oxford, England, the Principle Study, that should show, once and for all, if ivermectrin truly is efficacious in treating and preventing covid. It has been going on for 6 months. (I just found out recently that a similar large, controlled study is going on in this country, but I forgot what it is called. I think it is called Activ-6, but not sure.) It will be interesting to see the results, and it will be good finally to put the debate over it to rest.

Oh, wait, maybe this is the US trial:


As I have stated on here before, I think people with covid should have ivermectin available to use, if they are at home, and their doctors agree to prescribe it. It has few side effects at the proper dosage.
 
Last edited:

Furion

Well-known member
That's kind of an across the board insult of those that would disagree with you, which probably includes me. I'm neither ignorant, uninformed or paranoid.

I don't like weasely insults.

If people want to insult then do so directly.

Acting like they don't insult is insufferable, just a denial of their guilt.
 

Bonnie

Super Member
I don't like weasely insults.

If people want to insult then do so directly.

Acting like they don't insult is insufferable, just a denial of their guilt.
How about when we who have chosen to get the covid vaccines are called "sheeple" by some who are against those vaccines? Is that not a "weasely" insult? Or is that okay?

I have also seen some of the more far-righists on here call some who disagree with them about some other things--like the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol building--"sheeple." Is that also okay?
 
Last edited:
Top