Stop asking creepy stalker questions of people.
What are "military-styled weapons"?
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
What are 'large magazines'?
And how would any of these three things have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
You were fine with Obama pushing untrackable straw purchases in his F&F program. But how are you going to determine when a straw purchase has occurred?
And how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
You do know that will simply lead to more thefts and 3d printing, right?
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Are you fully responsible for crimes committed with your car by someone that stole it?
Again, how would that have prevented this shooting given the shooter is dead? Be specific.
How would you feasibly oversee such a thing? A Big Brother omnipresent camera system? How are you going to prevent exchanges in the woods?
And how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Red flag laws didn't work in New York with the Buffalo shooter.
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Ownership? Sure. Unless one is emancipated.
But how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
WHat sort of limits?
And how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Already the case in most places. Interesting though, the left fighting for the right for felons to vote but then this.....
But how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Violation of due process.
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
So, no guns allowed to be carried anywhere? Unconstitutional.
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
How about self defense? Collection? Or do we now not have the basic right to do either of those things?
How would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
No issue there.
But how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
Hell to the no. My wife should be able to defend herself with my guns, as should my teens, should I not be around. Not to mention that's absolutely unenforceable.
And how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
That's incredibly racist.
And how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
No one is stopping research into gun use. Obama had a very nice CDC run study that he promptly released at the end of the day on a Friday in hopes that little attention was paid to it, because it showed people with guns were more likely to escape a dangerous situation unscathed, and because it showed that defensive gun uses absolutely dwarf gun deaths even when one dishonestly includes suicides as gun deaths.
But again, how would that have prevented this shooting? Be specific.
I did not see a single thing in your list that would have prevented this shooting. If you think otherwise, answer one of my questions with specifics on how it would have done so.
I get it that people like you who own 169+ guns are very protective of your arsenals. Must make you feel so powerful and superior.
There is not a single statement in that long rant of yours in which you express sorrow over the needless and violent deaths of 18 little kids.
You have no policies that would stop these sorts of mass murders that are common in the USA but rare in other developed countries. The difference between us and them is our lax gun laws and availability of ever more powerful weapons. Weapons that you have no problem making available to anyone and everyone with no restrictions, right? And your response is to demand minutia about what defines assault weapons, and proof that any specific law would prevent deaths? Well, laws can actually prevent people from owning deadly weapons is linked to lower gun crime as shown in other countries. Why not give it a chance here? Maybe some other little kids won't have to die.
Restricting gun ownership and the types of guns would most definitely reduce gun deaths here as it does in other countries. If you think otherwise, then you should explain your thinking.
The fact is that your side has nothing to offer that would prevent such disasters. Zilch. Your only goal is to keep and expand your own arsenal and to allow others to do the same in total disregard of public safety.
We have followed your preferred path for decades, and what do we get, but more and more dead people, including little children. Have you ever considered that maybe guns for all is not the best path to take?
Nope. You are more concerned with protecting that arsenal of yours, because what are you without it.